r712
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2017
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 414
- Location
- FL
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Civic Type R (FK8) | 2017 Fit (GK5)
So I went straight to the Autobild source in German to see if I could learn anything different, and it seems they indeed found that the summer reference tire is one of the top 5 tested tires - but in stopping distance ONLY in the wet.
https://www.autobild.de/artikel/winterreifen-test-10811081.html (Used google translate to translate, so hopefully the translation wasn't misleading. Lol)
A couple things:
1) It appears that this test literally only looks at braking distances in the wet and snow. And there are 3 winter tires with equal/better braking distance in the wet according to the results. However, this test doesn't appear to take into account extended heavy braking over a long period of time, so I'm not convinced that the summer tires will not wear excessively over the period of a long winter of daily driving.
So while I will agree with your original point that it might not be necessary to switch out the summer tires if you live in a dry place where maybe the temperature only drops to 20F-40F when the sun is down - I would still advise switching to all seasons/winters if there is any chance your roads get icy or snowy. This leaves only a few regions in the US at least where I think leaving thee summers on during winter would apply. Can't speak for other continents around the world.
2) A minor thing, but I wanted to point out anyways. Autobild should identify which summer tire they used as a reference. All summer tires aren't equal and who knows if they used a 'max performance summer' or an 'ultra high performance summer' as the reference. My opinion, but I feel like using a tire like a Yokohama A052 could produce much different results than using the OEM Continentals on our car.
3) Like others have already stated. The temperature that the test was conducted in was never stated in the results. I've been in places where there's snow on the ground and the temp was a little over 40F. Again, I get that this was not the original point you were trying to make.
Just to be clear, I'm not trying to antagonize you. I'd just like to not rely on one single test where all the details aren't even presented properly to be taken as absolute truth. For now, I'll heed the warnings of the 'experts' in the industry.
https://www.autobild.de/artikel/winterreifen-test-10811081.html (Used google translate to translate, so hopefully the translation wasn't misleading. Lol)
A couple things:
1) It appears that this test literally only looks at braking distances in the wet and snow. And there are 3 winter tires with equal/better braking distance in the wet according to the results. However, this test doesn't appear to take into account extended heavy braking over a long period of time, so I'm not convinced that the summer tires will not wear excessively over the period of a long winter of daily driving.
So while I will agree with your original point that it might not be necessary to switch out the summer tires if you live in a dry place where maybe the temperature only drops to 20F-40F when the sun is down - I would still advise switching to all seasons/winters if there is any chance your roads get icy or snowy. This leaves only a few regions in the US at least where I think leaving thee summers on during winter would apply. Can't speak for other continents around the world.
2) A minor thing, but I wanted to point out anyways. Autobild should identify which summer tire they used as a reference. All summer tires aren't equal and who knows if they used a 'max performance summer' or an 'ultra high performance summer' as the reference. My opinion, but I feel like using a tire like a Yokohama A052 could produce much different results than using the OEM Continentals on our car.
3) Like others have already stated. The temperature that the test was conducted in was never stated in the results. I've been in places where there's snow on the ground and the temp was a little over 40F. Again, I get that this was not the original point you were trying to make.
Just to be clear, I'm not trying to antagonize you. I'd just like to not rely on one single test where all the details aren't even presented properly to be taken as absolute truth. For now, I'll heed the warnings of the 'experts' in the industry.
Sponsored