Post #28 Sonic is trying to make the point for not using Premium, though it is recommended by the manufacturer. Sonic must know more than the manufacturer?I would put more of the onus on Honda, I mean making a sport model that has 5 more HP, 5? Really? They don't even say the exhaust on the sport gets you anything. I think it's fair for buyers of the sport to settle for putting 87 in them if they don't want to purchase premium. When you consider the MPG it isn't that big of a deal to buy premium, granted. I'd say most Sport versions are sold for the center exhaust and other cosmetic features than the whopping 5 HP. Suspension is the same, just a bit quicker steer ratio, 6MT option... so really...does the 5 HP make it a 'sport' model? Honda, thanks for confusing the consumer.
I never understood arguing on a car forum...move on man. Life's too short for this back and forth shitPost #28 Sonic is trying to make the point for not using Premium, though it is recommended by the manufacturer. Sonic must know more than the manufacturer?
So calling someone out when they make claims which aren't true or accurate is not acceptable on discussion boards?I never understood arguing on a car forum...move on man. Life's too short for this back and forth shit
So regular made no difference on MPG and performance.http://www.consumerreports.org/fuel-economy/why-you-might-not-actually-need-premium-gas/
Here's some testing done by consumer guide on "premium gas recommended"
Both sedans achieved the same fuel economy when tested with regular fuel as with premium. During this testing, the cars felt and sounded the same; we did not experience any engine pinging or knocking noise in either car when using regular fuel.
The owner's manuals indicate that you might notice a decrease in performance when running on regular, but our test results say otherwise. The 0-60 mph acceleration times were identical in the TLX and Maxima on regular and premium gas.
Yep. Same thing with the K20. Hell, even the power output of the NSX is most likely underrated. Honda has always been very conservative when disclosing performance figures.Everyone who read the forums here know that the 1.5T was sandbagged from the factory anyway... BMW level sandbagging. They could be making an exact, geniune 205HP from the factory across all body styles regardless of transmission. Honda marketers will give the Sport a "6HP boost" on paper to think Sport buyers are getting something more for the work 'sport' when all models are the same lol.
The Honda guy interviewed by Zack regarding the Hatch is lying thru his teeth to save credibility. He specifically avoided Zack's question by saying the customer wants to pay more for performance. LOL for 6 hp? I'm gonna find him on Linkedin and send him a note saying Honda should be embarrassed. The compression is the same LX vs Sport & premium is only recommended ... not required. They just recommend for the extra 6 hp and think their millennial target demographic will eat it up. Honda has been doing the recommended thing for years in their acura's. Ford does the same thing for their Escape but the owners manual says 87 octane minimum. Hopefully someone will share the owners manual info for the sport hatch soon.And require 93 octane. Don't do it.
I think the whining is valid considering premium only buys a few extra HP... an extra 25 HP would make sense and be worth the premium.Hey you are welcome to run whatever you want in your cars, just quit dissing Honda by saying crap like the onus is on them when you knew full well that they recommended premium for the vehicle to run at it's optimum level.
You knew the price of admission going into this movie, now quit your whining.
Here's the complete owners manual for the '17 hatches...Hopefully someone will share the owners manual info for the sport hatch soon.
Page: 518Here's the complete owners manual for the '17 hatches...
http://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/pubs/OM/AH/ATGG1717OM/enu/ATGG1717OM.pdf