The Oil Thread

  1. josby

    josby Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Posts:
    816
    Thanked:
    513
    Location:
    Central VA
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic Touring sedan, 2002 Viper
    Yeah, I'm kind of surprised too. That's the first time I've used Amazon Basics oil. The previous ones were all lower, and they were (in order) Valvoline Synthetic, Mobil 1 Extended Performance, and Mobile 1 Advanced Fuel Economy.

    No, not mainly expressway driving. I'd say about 60%. My driving wasn't much different than for the previous oil intervals either. Maybe a little more highway due to a few summer trips out of town. My overall MPG has been 35.9, but for the duration of that oil interval it was 36.4, so that's probably also due to a little more highway. But still, nowhere near the EPA's 41mpg highway number for the car.
     
    Snoopyslr thanked this.
  2. josby

    josby Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Posts:
    816
    Thanked:
    513
    Location:
    Central VA
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic Touring sedan, 2002 Viper
    That's an interesting idea. I filled it to about the halfway mark again this time, so I'll report back if I get the same result at the next oil change.
     
  3. Zodd

    Zodd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Posts:
    130
    Thanked:
    70
    Location:
    Slovenia
    First Name:
    david
    Car(s):
    civic sport 1.5t 2018
    dealer changed oil that i picked, castrol titanium fst a3 0w-30, and after 2k miles i cant smell absolutely no gas on dipstick... i find that weird, lets see what happens after few months... car is civic 1.5

    and gas is really easy to smell...
     
  4. Dario1101

    Dario1101 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2017
    Posts:
    121
    Thanked:
    57
    Location:
    Miramar, Florida
    Car(s):
    2017 Honda Civic Hatchback LX-MODEL
    It's that time again! My car just hit 15% on the oil life and I am nearing 30,000 miles on the car. It's been a great ride for the last two and a half years. My first car and I love everything it's done for me. I learned a lot about cars in the process of maintaining this one.
    For some weird reason, I recently went to check on the bottle of Amazon Basics 0W-20 oil I had in my laundry room and found that the bottle had a deep crack down the middle. Had I squeezed the bottle hard enough I probably would have broken it and would have had oil seep everywhere! Mind you, that's a hard plastic bottle for oil; I wonder how it developed that long crack down the middle. Perhaps when I first opened it out of the package when I received it I cut it with a knife; I don't know why I wouldn't have noticed it before though.

    At any rate, I am going to order a new 0W-20 5-quart bottle of Amazon Basics engine oil, alongside a M1-110 Mobil 1 Oil Filter, and probably do the oil change sometime at the beginning of December. Like I mentioned before, I will be sending two oil analysis kits out for processing at that time: One will be the used oil (Mobil 1 0W-20 Extended Performance) that I will be changing out for the new 0W-20 Amazon Basics oil; and the second one will be a fresh sample of the 0W-20 Amazon Basics oil so that the oil analysis company has a reference material to look at when I send out my used oil of the Amazon Basics oil in about 6 months time.

    I'm a bit worried that the Amazon Basics oil won't work as effectively in my engine because it will be diluted by some leftover Mobil 1 oil, but I hope it all works out.
     
    Snoopyslr thanked this.
  5. Dario1101

    Dario1101 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2017
    Posts:
    121
    Thanked:
    57
    Location:
    Miramar, Florida
    Car(s):
    2017 Honda Civic Hatchback LX-MODEL
    I have gone ahead and did my oil change on Wednesday. I sent two samples of oil, one of the oil that was in my engine, and another of the virgin Amazon Basics 0W-20 oil, with a Total Base Number (TBN) on there so we can see what's up lol. I will post the results when I get them in about two weeks.
     
  6. TypeSiR

    TypeSiR Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Posts:
    1,322
    Thanked:
    894
    Occupation:
    Car Driver
    Location:
    SoCal
    Car(s):
    1.5T Civic, CTR, MX-5, Fit
    #456 TypeSiR, Dec 7, 2019
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2019
  7. Gruber

    Gruber Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2018
    Posts:
    1,245
    Thanked:
    698
    Location:
    TN
    First Name:
    Mark
    Car(s):
    2018 Honda Civic Sport Touring; 2009 Honda CR-V EX-L
    Also noticed this new oil just a couple days ago at Costco. It should hurt the Amazon brand. Shipping oil by the bottle can't be free. Not that I'm going to buy it myself, but the cheap oil competition is interesting now. One thing I don't understand is how some auto parts stores like Pep Boys etc. still manage to offer motor oils at the prices they have.
     
  8. parshisa

    parshisa Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Posts:
    634
    Thanked:
    263
    Location:
    Texas
    Car(s):
    Civic X Hatchback LX
    With the recent AAP clearance of mobil super synthetic at 0.65$/qt and AZ clearance of Shell Rotella gas truck at 2$/qt (free after rebate), it’ll be a WHILE before i need to buy oil again. 80+qts stash that cost me 60$ - hell yeah lol

    on a side note, costco oil will do just fine, especially 5w30
     
  9. Swordfish

    Swordfish Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2017
    Posts:
    764
    Thanked:
    308
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    Car(s):
    2017 Honda Civic
    I did see that oil as well at Costco. Is it fine to run 5W-20 instead of 0W-20 ? It's pretty warm here in California year around, so I'm not concerned about the cold, but in a colder climate area, I can see it being a bigger issue.

    One thing that I came across while looking was this here:

    https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2192.pdf


    Says Honda's OEM filter is 66.5% efficient ? Seems like more emphasis is given on oil flow, but I really don't like seeing that efficiency rating. Next oil change I'm going to use something else. I used for my other car Wix XP and have seen the breakdowns. The car has over 8,000 miles and the oil still looks good. At amazon they are pretty reasonable in price and will use those moving forward.
     
  10. JO3L

    JO3L Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2018
    Posts:
    92
    Thanked:
    71
    Location:
    Southern California
    First Name:
    Joel
    Car(s):
    FC1E5, NA6CE
    Anyone on here have any experience with Eneos Racing Street 0w50? Looking for feedback from track guys or warmer climate zones specifically on this oil. I am using their 0w20 oil now for two oil change intervals, but want something with more wear protection for So Cal summer track days.

    https://www.eneos.us/product/eneos-racing-street-0w-50/

    ENEOS-RACING-STREET-0W-50-Typical-Properties-0418b-1.png
     
  11. parshisa

    parshisa Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Posts:
    634
    Thanked:
    263
    Location:
    Texas
    Car(s):
    Civic X Hatchback LX
    5w20,5w30,10w30 in your climate will do just fine. Run with confidence. As far as filters go, get yourslef From Ultra and run it for 2-3 OCI, no issues at all.
     
  12. absolude

    absolude Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2017
    Posts:
    288
    Thanked:
    72
    Location:
    GTA
    Car(s):
    KW SC 2007 CSX Type S, 2018 LX Hatch MT
    Just found this on a bitog thread.
    http://pqiadata.org/AmazonBasics_0W20.html
    It'll be interesting to see your results.
     
  13. charleswrivers

    charleswrivers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2017
    Posts:
    2,759
    Thanked:
    2,948
    Occupation:
    EMNCS(SS)
    Location:
    Kingsland, GA
    First Name:
    Charles
    Car(s):
    '14 Odyssey EX-L '18 Civic SI Sedan '94 300zx twin turbo 2001 Ford F-150 Sport
    Out of curiosity… as I'm kind of ignorant on the subject...

    Assuming you have a filter that filters something like 99%+ of anything out of the oil at the 20 micron+ level... but still even a few percent at the single-digit micron level... since the oil is constantly passing through the filter and UOIs are looking at wear metals for engine wear... silicates for (I assume) sand bypassing the air filter and fuel for oil dilution (the filter won't filter fuel intrusion obviously)... do UOAs really provide a good basis for engine wear? The suspended wear products are going to be at some equilibrium bases on the actual wear happening and filter efficiency. Even if you had some event that caused large particles to actually cause bearing wear because the particles, at least combined, were able to bridge the bearing gap... they'd pretty much immediately be filtered out and you wouldn't see it in any UOA unless you got to the oil right after the event occurred. I'd think to actually determine engine wear, you'd need to somehow sample the filter media itself.

    Again... curious. I've never been terribly interested in oil discussions... and I was reading another thread where someone was again talking up oil dilution, and I agree UOAs being a way to identify it... but actual wear? I don't see how it'd be a good way of determining it. The tiny quantities of wear products at their equilibrium in the oil between two filters wouldn't necessarily equate to the difference in grams of wear materials trapped in the filter media. I see the reports discussing concentrating in units of ppm... but what I'm not getting is what the particle size is of said materials. I also global levels... but no ranges. Without a range (again, for the few I've looked at)... it doesn't really give, me at least, any good feeling about whether some of the reports shared are good or bad. Some of the reports seem to have wear products an order of magnitude above the global level... which would make me think is bad, then again some of those reports were of newer engines which I assume is from some break in. Some of the text on the Blackstone reports makes it look like the global information is just that... global. If I had a larger displacement V8 with several times the amount of perspective contact area between bearing surfaces and ring to cylinder surface... I'd assume the equilibrium of those engines should (could) be higher based on design alone. I've looked at just a few and a lot of the wear metals for some larger engines were a lot higher. Whether this was because of my theory or just because those engines were wearing more for whatever reason... I can't say. If it's true though, it'd make global averages kind of skewed if your engine size was on either end of the spectrum possibly. And this is to say nothing about the other variables like air cleanliness at your air filter efficiency... oil/viscosity used... oil filter used... etc.

    I've been doing a bit of reading and apparently practically nothing in the oil is of larger size... and that makes since based on even poor filters having efficiencies over 50% for single pass and single pass isn't indicative of what's actually happening in our engines... and the largest concentration... about 1/4 or so of all contaminates are apparently around the 1 micron level... which most filters apparently filter poorly but still can handle in the single digit efficiency ranges.

    Just a bored Sunday working on some random training I need to knock out and I'm so desperate to think about something else... I've taken to contemplating the riddle of stee-... er... oil.
     
    Snoopyslr thanked this.
  14. Gruber

    Gruber Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2018
    Posts:
    1,245
    Thanked:
    698
    Location:
    TN
    First Name:
    Mark
    Car(s):
    2018 Honda Civic Sport Touring; 2009 Honda CR-V EX-L
    Good questions, and professional oil analysts have thought more recently about these issues. For machines that are critical and/or worth much money, more extensive oil analyses can be done to get a full picture.

    First, the spectroscopic methods are limited to particles up to max 5 µm for ICP spectroscopy. "Wear particles larger than 5 µm have no chance of being detected." They just don't make it to where they can be evaporated in the instrument. So there are some particles that are mostly not caught by the oil filter and may keep circulating, but are still ignored by the spectroscope. And then there are those larger particles lodged the filter, but some fraction may be as small as a couple of µm.

    It is possible to digest the whole oil sample in acid and then pass it through the spectroscope. The difference from the direct sample would be the particles too large for spectroscopy but not caught by the filter. The same can be done with a sample, or even all of the filter paper. It is also possible to count particles in the oil under microscope, but it's not easy to identify them. That would almost double the price (Blackstone) and still not include what's on the filter . Blackstone centrifuges oil samples to determine insoluble content, but they don't analyze these solids under the standard analysis.

    So if you had an increase of wear metal particles sized about 3-4 µm and larger, the standard UOA would likely not detect it.
     
    charleswrivers and Snoopyslr thanked this.
  15. charleswrivers

    charleswrivers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2017
    Posts:
    2,759
    Thanked:
    2,948
    Occupation:
    EMNCS(SS)
    Location:
    Kingsland, GA
    First Name:
    Charles
    Car(s):
    '14 Odyssey EX-L '18 Civic SI Sedan '94 300zx twin turbo 2001 Ford F-150 Sport
    Thanks! I guess the think that’s getting me regarding their use for engine wear is that it seems like everything isn’t using a high/low spec range... but a global average to compare. I do think there good value in the UOAs for seeing the fuel content... or the current viscosity as a function to determine dilution/whether whatever the additive pack the oil has to determine if it’s, well, ‘wore out’ to determine for extended OCIs on the high quality ‘boutique’ oils, how far they can be pushed.

    I just haven’t seen looking at the UOAs how their very good at determining engine wear, other than comparing one car it itself over its life. Even then, if you had some event occur that caused wear, I’d think the oil filter would rapidly clear the oil and that the wear materials would have a half-life so that after 5 full circulations of oil (god knows how long that’d take... but I’d assume in the realm of minutes). Very heavy things that aren’t entrained would certainly fall out in the pan and be a red flag if you saw... y’know, bits (assuming they’d wash out and off the pan on a drain), but if we’re talking large bits, well... they’d be too big for the UOA to catch anyways. Thinking of large turbines, their bearings have babbit which is magnetic so you can see whether or not you have excessive bearing wear by looking at your magnets that is in the filtration system. I never thought I’d it before, but a magnetic drain plug would kind of be a good way to quantify some wear. You could even go crazy I guess and do a ‘clean weight’ then weight the think using a little gram/reloading scale to quantify whatever it has on it once you dab the oil off of it.

    I’ve never gotten a UOA but have looked at a bunch of other peoples out of interest... but using them to analyze wear just doesn’t make sense to me based on the data they have to compare the provided numbers against and how the oil should be filtered other than I guess comparing whatever equilibrium wear products exist immersed in the oil between different oil changes when you’re comparing, say, if one oil filter is more effective in filtering small (<5 micron) things in the oil.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...