ARod1982
Senior Member
Holy shit! 500 dollars. What are they thinking!$300 seems a bit expensive for a short ram ... and when they claim it's 45% off, $500 is outrageous.
Sponsored
Holy shit! 500 dollars. What are they thinking!$300 seems a bit expensive for a short ram ... and when they claim it's 45% off, $500 is outrageous.
500 dollars to lose power and heat soak. That makes me want to buy that!Holy shit! 500 dollars. What are they thinking!
I dont understand how companies are allowed to advertise gains like this knowing that no one can duplicate them.500 dollars to lose power and heat soak. That makes me want to buy that!
They did the same thing with the 9th gen Si, claimed 10ish HP gain, but when someone else tested it out it actually was worse than the OEM intake lmao.
I dont understand how companies are allowed to advertise gains like this knowing that no one can duplicate them.
It is because they are clever enough to put "results may vary" at the end; the secret science behind every advertisement. It is shameful, nonetheless.
I dont understand how companies are allowed to advertise gains like this knowing that no one can duplicate them.
This is a valuable bit of information here. Thanks for posting it up.Once its soaked its soaked. Sure that picture was at idle but after I stopped it hadnt changed since I was on the freeway, Even once Im driving, the only thing that comes down is the IAT2 which is post intercooler. And once its soaked, it doesnt budge either. Once my IAT1 at the intake is in the 90s-100s it never comes down, moving or not.
For those claiming heat soak without any data, I will let the pictures speak. Cool air could be better, but if you bash aftermarket intakes you have to bash Honda engineers as well because all the data I found has the stock temps just as high or higher. The thermal images were all taken after hard driving. The K&N was actually probably driven even harder prior to photos.