Insurance when Driving your New Car off the lot in California

  1. dthatcher7

    dthatcher7 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2016
    Posts:
    202
    Thanked:
    64
    Location:
    California
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX w/Sensing
    I wanted to pass this along because it is a gotcha I recently ran into. In the state of California, your current insurance company must cover your new car for 10 days, to give you time to add it to the policy.
    The gotcha with this is that the "coverage" afforded under this 10 day grace period is only whatever coverage you currently have. So if all you've got is a jalopy with liability only, and you drive off the lot in a new 2016 Civic, you are driving around with liability only.
    Incidentally, if you are in the position of having no auto insurance at all, you will have no 10 day grace period, because there's no insurance to begin with.
    Apparently a lot of California dealers are content to look at your current auto insurance ID cards without inquiring as to your coverage levels. So before you drive off the lot uninsured or under-insured, make sure you know what your existing auto insurance coverage is. Better yet, get on the horn with your insurance agent and add the car before you drive it at all!
     
    Design and nicoled985 thanked this.
  2. Pearl

    Pearl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Posts:
    327
    Thanked:
    360
    Location:
    SWFL
    Car(s):
    2016 CivicT
    That's good advice. I'm not even sure how things work when getting a new car but I always ensure to speak with my insurance company while at the dealership before driving the new car off the lot because things can happen in an instant. I don't think a finance company would even allow me to drive off with their car without full coverage.
     
    nicoled985 thanked this.
  3. Gavnzdad

    Gavnzdad Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2016
    Posts:
    1,032
    Thanked:
    708
    Occupation:
    ...
    Location:
    ...
    Car(s):
    ...
    #3 Gavnzdad, Jun 14, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2016
    I would never leave the lot with a new car without full coverage, I would cause a wreck just thinking about it. I think some dealers won't let you leave with a new car unless you have proof of full coverage, but I'm not sure. On a jalopy, yeah liability is cool. On a new car, only an severe idiot wouldn't have full coverage.
     
  4. nicoled985

    nicoled985 Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Posts:
    176
    Thanked:
    55
    Location:
    California
    Car(s):
    2016 Honda Civic EX-L Sedan
    If you don't mind me asking what are your limits on your insurance?
     
  5. slowride

    slowride Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2016
    Posts:
    897
    Thanked:
    593
    Location:
    Midwest
    Car(s):
    2018 PMM Type-R
    If you lease (especially) Honda will require you to have specific minimum coverage before you get the keys, so this scenario should not occur.

    Also, it is wise to contact your or potential insurers before you begin the purchasing process so you don't get surprised by a premium increase.
     
    dthatcher7 thanked this.
  6. OP
    OP
    dthatcher7

    dthatcher7 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2016
    Posts:
    202
    Thanked:
    64
    Location:
    California
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX w/Sensing
    Yes... getting insurance quotes for all the cars I was considering played a big part in my decision. I was actually pretty interested in a fully loaded 2017 Elantra except the insurance was so much more than the Civic. At least in my case.
     
  7. Gavnzdad

    Gavnzdad Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2016
    Posts:
    1,032
    Thanked:
    708
    Occupation:
    ...
    Location:
    ...
    Car(s):
    ...
    #7 Gavnzdad, Jun 14, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2016
    I have a progressive 50/100/50 policy. Mine is full coverage on both my Coupe and my wife's HR-V. My policy covers everything. I don't take chances with a new car. I also have GAP coverage on my Coupe.
     
    nicoled985 thanked this.
  8. aaronarf

    aaronarf Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Posts:
    196
    Thanked:
    140
    Location:
    VA Beach
    Car(s):
    12' Tacoma, 16' Civic Touring
    50/100 isn't enough coverage these days
     
  9. schen72

    schen72 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Posts:
    65
    Thanked:
    33
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Car(s):
    2006 Acura RL Tech, 2008 Acura RDX Tech, 2016 Acura ILX Tech A-SPEC
    Dealers in CA require proof of insurance before you can drive off the lot. This is required by law. If you finance/lease the car, you also need to have full coverage and I believe each lender has their own minimums, but it's probably around 50/100. If you buy the car outright, you only need to show proof of insurance and they don't care about your minimums. This is how it went for me.
     
    joserevelo thanked this.
  10. Gavnzdad

    Gavnzdad Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2016
    Posts:
    1,032
    Thanked:
    708
    Occupation:
    ...
    Location:
    ...
    Car(s):
    ...
    Dude, I don't drive a Ferrari. :dunno:
     
  11. schen72

    schen72 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Posts:
    65
    Thanked:
    33
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Car(s):
    2006 Acura RL Tech, 2008 Acura RDX Tech, 2016 Acura ILX Tech A-SPEC
    #11 schen72, Jun 14, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2016
    The amount of coverage necessary depends on the amount of assets you would be protecting. If you have little or nothing to your name, minimum coverage is good enough. Sally, some people have no coverage in this case. But if you own your home, have sizable savings, more coverage may be necessary. On top of the auto policy, done people opt for an "umbrella"policy which is usually an additional $1-5M of coverage.
     
  12. Gavnzdad

    Gavnzdad Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2016
    Posts:
    1,032
    Thanked:
    708
    Occupation:
    ...
    Location:
    ...
    Car(s):
    ...
    Uhmmm...guys, a 50/100/50 policy is not a minimum policy. That's a good policy. The 25/50/25 is the lowest full coverage you can get I think.
     
  13. aaronarf

    aaronarf Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Posts:
    196
    Thanked:
    140
    Location:
    VA Beach
    Car(s):
    12' Tacoma, 16' Civic Touring
    Each state has different minimums. Higher insurance policy isn't necessarily to protect your vehicle cost its to minimize any potential damages incurred by law suits if your at fault in an accident. Even if you are NOT at fault, and whomever hits you has state minimums your under-insured coverage will come in play as far as pay outs, property damage, passenger medical expenses etc.

    Just something to look into - not trying to go completely off topic.
     
  14. kqn

    kqn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2016
    Posts:
    141
    Thanked:
    144
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Car(s):
    2016 Honda Civic EX-T
    I drove off the lot and Honda supplied me free insurance for one month from western general because I told them my insurance information is at home but I don't remember the details.
     
  15. schen72

    schen72 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Posts:
    65
    Thanked:
    33
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Car(s):
    2006 Acura RL Tech, 2008 Acura RDX Tech, 2016 Acura ILX Tech A-SPEC
    I think CA's minimum is 15/30, which would barely cover just the value of a Civic.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...