Flex Fuel Owners

  1. Dragnet

    Dragnet Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    702
    Thanked:
    206
    Location:
    Huntsville, Alabama
    First Name:
    Joe
    Car(s):
    2017 Civic Type R, 2016 Accord Sport
    Ah the stock fuel system is too weak. I understand now. Hell, once a better fuel system is available will the internals be able to handle all the extra power? It seems like folks are already teetering on the edge right now.
     
  2. iLovePho

    iLovePho Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2017
    Posts:
    644
    Thanked:
    497
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Car(s):
    2017 CW CTR #2060
  3. boosted180sx

    boosted180sx Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Posts:
    3,399
    Thanked:
    2,768
    Location:
    torrance, ca
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR, 2019 370Z Nismo, '16 ILX
    it ran good though on E30 though, don't get me wrong. I had to do many revisions though from the base map that was provided. I was dropping fuel pressure like a mofo on the provided base maps.

    as long as you don't give the engine gobs of low end torque, it should be ok. I'm not really aiming for that high though. I'm probably around 340 hp with 91 and just looking to get around 400 really. If i had 93 octane here, i'd probably be satisified enough tbh
     
    Meat Hammer and Dragnet thanked this.
  4. Dragnet

    Dragnet Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    702
    Thanked:
    206
    Location:
    Huntsville, Alabama
    First Name:
    Joe
    Car(s):
    2017 Civic Type R, 2016 Accord Sport
    91 octane is hard to find here. 93 is all over the place. I wouldn't mind my car having around another 100hp and torque. I'm just paranoid to proceed with any mods.
     
  5. BerzerkerX

    BerzerkerX Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2018
    Posts:
    77
    Thanked:
    45
    Location:
    New York
    Car(s):
    2018 Honda Civic Type R
    I am running flex fuel, intercooler and a tune. I havemt dyno'd it but would like to say its close to 370hp and 395tq, if not more, but not really sure.
     
    Dragnet thanked this.
  6. b2point0h

    b2point0h Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2019
    Posts:
    58
    Thanked:
    32
    Location:
    California
    First Name:
    Brandon
    Car(s):
    2019 Civic Type R
    #21 b2point0h, Oct 22, 2019
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2019
    I'm running the PRL Flex Fuel kit, and would highly recommend it. Better mount, better wiring and fully plug and play.

    I also have PRL HV intake, PRL front pipe, and ran E27 mix with 91. When I did a virtual dyno run, numbers were around 396/379 whp/wtq.
     
    Meat Hammer thanked this.
  7. Bighouse20

    Bighouse20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Posts:
    16
    Thanked:
    2
    Location:
    Ohio
    Car(s):
    2017 Civic Type R
    are you running with the fuel pump duty limit?
     
  8. b2point0h

    b2point0h Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2019
    Posts:
    58
    Thanked:
    32
    Location:
    California
    First Name:
    Brandon
    Car(s):
    2019 Civic Type R
  9. boosted180sx

    boosted180sx Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Posts:
    3,399
    Thanked:
    2,768
    Location:
    torrance, ca
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR, 2019 370Z Nismo, '16 ILX
    yeah and thats with hondatas afr. you'll run out of fuel even quicker if you do richen the afr too. It's really unfortunate they put such a weak fuel system in this car. Can't even handle a bolt on tuned car.

    i personally don't believe flex fuel to be worth if you have access to 93 octane. For people on the west coast who only has 91 octane, i can see it being useful for slightly more power over 91.
     
  10. Dragnet

    Dragnet Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    702
    Thanked:
    206
    Location:
    Huntsville, Alabama
    First Name:
    Joe
    Car(s):
    2017 Civic Type R, 2016 Accord Sport
    I have access to 93. It's super hard to even find 91 here. 93 is everywhere. Why do you think the flex fuel isn't worth it if you have access to 93? Are the numbers not that much different if you're running a tune on 93 or a flex kit/tune combo where 91 is only available?
     
  11. Bighouse20

    Bighouse20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Posts:
    16
    Thanked:
    2
    Location:
    Ohio
    Car(s):
    2017 Civic Type R
    I ran into issues with 93 and E30. Maxes out at E15 even. Also, right now im running E23 and It's making air charge choppy, and the car surges at peak boost (hits around 23)
     
  12. iLovePho

    iLovePho Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2017
    Posts:
    644
    Thanked:
    497
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Car(s):
    2017 CW CTR #2060
    What he's saying is that a tuned 93 map vs. a tuned flex fuel map on the stock fuel system may not provide enough gains to justify the expense. In my case, I gained 27whp/14wtq when comparing tuned flex fuel map (running 40% E85) vs. just 93. If I were to stop modding right then and there, then it would not have been worth it for me. But when I bought the flex fuel kit, I had planned to do more down the road (turbo upgrade, fuel system upgrade) when they became available, so flex fuel would've made an even bigger difference over 93.
     
    Dragnet and boosted180sx thanked this.
  13. boosted180sx

    boosted180sx Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Posts:
    3,399
    Thanked:
    2,768
    Location:
    torrance, ca
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR, 2019 370Z Nismo, '16 ILX
    i personally believe it to be not worth it if you have access to 93 because the power figures are not different. Especially once you are custom tuned. The slight gains over 93 isn't worth the hassle of having to blend. I think Drob got like 15hp/0 torque gain over 93 when he tuned it on E25. You have to dial back a lot of boost in order to stop the pump from maxing out. Less boost and same power isn't necessary a bad thing but it does come with more hassle.

    now if you only have 91 octane, the gain can be worth it for some since you can get 93 octane power without having to blend 100 octane with 91 to get 93. I ran E27 on a map that i modified myself before but ultimately got rid of the kit and went back to pump gas and had it tuned by drob.

    Once a bigger fuel system option is available, i will revisit though.
     
    CrippleRipple and Dragnet thanked this.
  14. d15b7

    d15b7 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2018
    Posts:
    42
    Thanked:
    63
    Location:
    21921
    First Name:
    Todd
    Car(s):
    2018 Civic Type R, 1995 Civic EG K24/20 EFR7163 Fortune Auto track weapon
    hi guys. great discussion! how about someone like me, who has a totally non modified car (no exhaust no downpipe no intake no nothing) and wants the biggest easiest stealthiest bang for the buck? I was considering the Flex fuel setup for the best easiest safest gains on a otherwise non modded car. i live on the east coast where 93 is widely available (its what i fill up with every day) and E85 is around too; my plan would be to put about 4 gal of E85 in with 6 gal of 93 most times. what are your opinions for my special case of thought?
     
    Dragnet thanked this.
  15. iLovePho

    iLovePho Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2017
    Posts:
    644
    Thanked:
    497
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Car(s):
    2017 CW CTR #2060
    Custom tuned Hondata reflash for 93 would be the best bang for the buck. No need for Flex Fuel if you don't plan to do anything else to the car.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...