Metal_Hatch
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2017
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 54
- Location
- MD
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Civic Hatchback Sport
So it did make 311.7 HP?
Sponsored
No, it made 311.7 PS which is ~308 HP "at the crank"So it did make 311.7 HP?
He maxed out the stock map sensor. He's waiting to upgrade to a 4bar to raise the boost pass 29psi safely .I see now, and that's around 267 to the wheels....hmmm
Isn't this right around the same power that Vit is getting from the 1.5 on a stock turbo/motor using 93 octane
Honestly, I wish I had a CVT Type R. A car with 8500-9000rpm peak and the CVT hanging right there and not needing a whole bunch of torque to make good numbers. Yeah...that's just me though.Oh jeez, now this is a featured thread. This is even worse than the Type R with the CVT; the disproving information is on the first page. @Administrator please do some more thorough reading
^^^This right here. Especially on street tires. Yep!I personally don't care for the numbers. Your time at the track(drag or circuit) is what counts
U guys referring to the kid on IG?Honestly, I wish I had a CVT Type R. A car with 8500-9000rpm peak and the CVT hanging right there and not needing a whole bunch of torque to make good numbers. Yeah...that's just me though.
Not saying this Type R is high rpm like the days of the older model one(s).
There was some kid on IG posting pics, but now I feel like a dummy cause cause I can't find it at all.I have no idea who 'the kid on IG' is. Guess I better do a search.