Featured C&D - Lightning lap 2018 : Civic Type R (With Video)

  1. Boostedomega

    Boostedomega Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2018
    Posts:
    21
    Thanked:
    9
    Location:
    Australia
    First Name:
    Chris
    Car(s):
    Civic type R, Civic RS sport.
    I took the type R for a test drive on the weekend, I can now understand the hype behind this machine.

    I have always wondered how a 300hp car can achieve such incredible times, but honestly the car feels like its closer to 400hp.

    Do you guys think the type R has more power than honda is advertising? Once boost comes on it pulls incredibly hard, almost like a tuned evo 9.
     
    Driveitlikeuboughtit thanked this.
  2. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    820
    Thanked:
    538
    Location:
    USA
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    What's wrong with you illiterate morons itching for fights - where have I said the M2 is not a good car? I can't believe you wrote all this shit while completely ignoring what I'm saying, which is the M2 is 60k and a CTR is 35k. And the CTR is faster around the 'Ring. Nothing you said changed any of that.
     
  3. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    820
    Thanked:
    538
    Location:
    USA
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    Roll cage and weight delete to compensate for safety. Tires. That's it. You can speculate about "who knows what other changes" but you don't know and there is no reason for you to suspect otherwise besides, "muh m2 should be faster."
     
    inertiadrifto86, Gansan and Boostedomega thanked this.
  4. yargk

    yargk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2017
    Posts:
    435
    Thanked:
    315
    Location:
    SF bay area
    Car(s):
    '18 Civic Type R, '16 GT4, '07 WRX wagon
    It's very lightweight for a spacious 4-door, it's FWD so more of the engine power gets to the wheels, it has a wide powerband, and good gearing. All those things add up to it being a quick car on track and on a mountain road. I don't think it's underrated too much, just more power at the wheels due to FWD.
     
    Meat Hammer and Boostedomega thanked this.
  5. RacingManiac

    RacingManiac Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2018
    Posts:
    463
    Thanked:
    239
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    First Name:
    Jen
    Car(s):
    2016 VW GTI, 2018 ABM CTR R-17001
    All the industry pool cars for the ring needs cage, I think thats actually what's regulated for work there.....
     
    kevv_FK8, Gansan and Driveitlikeuboughtit thanked this.
  6. heavyD

    heavyD Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Posts:
    462
    Thanked:
    335
    Location:
    Calgary
    Car(s):
    2018 F87
    You cannot go to a Honda dealership and buy a Civic Type R like the one that ran the ring time. There's really no argument or debate here as the car was not stock. It's a nice time but it's as relevant as any modded car on a track.
     
    baldheadracing thanked this.
  7. RacingManiac

    RacingManiac Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2018
    Posts:
    463
    Thanked:
    239
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    First Name:
    Jen
    Car(s):
    2016 VW GTI, 2018 ABM CTR R-17001
    FWIW, you can't do that for any of them...most OEM use pre-production cars for ring testing...
     
  8. heavyD

    heavyD Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Posts:
    462
    Thanked:
    335
    Location:
    Calgary
    Car(s):
    2018 F87
  9. RacingManiac

    RacingManiac Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2018
    Posts:
    463
    Thanked:
    239
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    First Name:
    Jen
    Car(s):
    2016 VW GTI, 2018 ABM CTR R-17001
    I mean for what its worth OEM definitely "prep" their cars before, outside of the mandatory safety gears, the data system and probably more optimized alignment and setup. I actually don't think they would deliberately alter the performance but maybe more liberally option the car in ways that is more specific, ie the NISMO GTR N-Attack whathaveyou package for the Nismo GTR, which was a rather extensive option that push the car to something like $250k. But their drivers also are not your average joe. Porsche use their pool of race car drivers to set their times. VW with their Clubsport S had some pro touring car driver. GM actually had most of their times set by in-house development engineers, a lot of which I've met and seen first hand how they can wheel the cars around.
     
  10. yargk

    yargk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2017
    Posts:
    435
    Thanked:
    315
    Location:
    SF bay area
    Car(s):
    '18 Civic Type R, '16 GT4, '07 WRX wagon
    This is getting a little out of hand. Absolutely stock vs. stock is a little meaningless anyway. All track day driven cars have a little prep: alignment, brake pads, tires. So then the question is, at that level of prep, what's faster? This can be seen if you go to just a few track days and watch the advanced groups closely enough to know who is 3 seconds off a pro and who is only 1 second off a pro. Compare that second set of drivers. The CTR is probably about 2 seconds slower around a 2 minute track than the M2, from what I've seen, which is impressive given the power difference.

    Ring times are fun to watch and argue about, and they represent more data than nothing, but most of the time it's not apples to apples. The closest thing to an apples to apples comparison is the German magazine sport auto, since it's independent, often they use the same driver, and I think they make sure the car is stock. They tested both cars and got 8:01, the same time. I wonder if the stability of the CTR on the long high speed stretches helped!

    27882763419_4f0d5849b5_o.jpg
     
  11. Gansan

    Gansan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    Posts:
    221
    Thanked:
    196
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    First Name:
    Glen
    Car(s):
    1999 NSX, 1998 Integra Type R, 2018 Civic Type R, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD
    Lol the two of you with the "Driveitlikeu<insert word here>it" handles--it took me a while to realize there are two people.

    At the time, Honda was pretty up front about what they did to the car, and imagine the consequences for them if they were actually caught lying. VW dieselgate would ensue and I'm sure they don't want that. They said specifically the cage was designed not to add stiffness to the car. It's "floating" so that it is not welded at all the normal points of the passenger compartment. Roll cages are heavy, if you have ever carried the parts, so it's fair to remove some stuff to bring the weight back to where it is supposed to be. They specified they ran on Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires, which are not oem but they were what VW ran on the GTI Clubsport S (oem for them) when they set their record. You can only take their word on whether their engine was tuned or not, but think of the engineers whose honor is at stake. Why would they need to cheat when their management and company gave them permission and blessing to go for the record? They have all the resources to make it happen.

    I guess you can say the Vbox or whatever they used was not accurate, but then you can just time it from the video as well. I'm sure if there was enough clamor, they could release the telemetry data like Lamborghini did with the Huracan Performante.

    It's not like the CTR is turning out to be a dog in the magazine reviews and yet posts a suspiciously spectacular 'Ring lap time. The lap times and relative ranking with other cars match up.

    Edit: While I was writing, yargk posted and makes a point about consistency, or rather lack of it in testing. Very legitimate point. But I also think if you are going for a record, it's totally fair to use the driver who has thousands of track miles of experience in your car and can wring out all the performance it can deliver.
     
    Driveitlikeuboughtit thanked this.
  12. wishistillhadmyITR

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    39
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    I think this is right. The aero on the CTR (which the M2 doesn’t really have) probably gives the CTR the advantage on those high speed stretches and long sweeping turns.
     
    UFO CTR thanked this.
  13. UFO CTR

    UFO CTR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2016
    Posts:
    2,532
    Thanked:
    1,853
    Location:
    San Frrancisco, CA
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR#1348
    That's it! I really want to see a direct head to head battle between the M2 and the Type R! Road and Track, Car and Driver or Motor Trend, can you guys make this happen? :popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:
     
    Meat Hammer thanked this.
  14. neteng101

    neteng101 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2016
    Posts:
    450
    Thanked:
    247
    Location:
    NJ
    Car(s):
    2017 Honda Civic Hatchback Sport Touring
    I don't get the M2 love - its heavy and almost universally chastised for still having numb steering. An E36 it is not - too heavy, doesn't communicate back to you, even if it might have brute force from the engine department. I've not blinked once at BMWs for years now - they seem to be full of silly gimmicks like hand gesture controls - vs. focusing on the driving experience.
     
  15. kevv_FK8

    kevv_FK8 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2018
    Posts:
    393
    Thanked:
    233
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Car(s):
    2018 CTR #15004, 2013 900whp si (sold) 2016 Lexus IS300 (sold)
    so true, we need this lol
     
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...