Featured C&D - Lightning lap 2018 : Civic Type R (With Video)

  1. iqbad

    iqbad Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2017
    Posts:
    60
    Thanked:
    20
    Location:
    Sweden
    First Name:
    Eric
    Car(s):
    Honda Civic Type R 2018, Audi TT-RS 2010 400hp, Audi A6 3.0 TFSI 400hp
    Whe tested by sport auto on the ring with same tires the M2 and fk8 had the exact same time. This test was done with semi-professional drivers so it is a good comparison.

    The testers also analyzed their data against the official Honda lap video and concluded that the Honda test car most likely had higher power. The corner speeds were almost the same but top speed in the straights was much higher on the Honda test car.
     
    wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  2. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    #17 Driveitlikeuboughtit, Sep 23, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
    What am I apologizing for? I think you're here apologizing for a 60k BMW that is not 25k better than a Type R.

    I don't really care about times and the limited data they provide. I'm not a pro, you're not a pro, we're not maximizing anything around here. It's just a fact that the M2 is slower around the 'Ring if you look at official times. It's not rocket science - a M2 weighs 3600 lbs and a Type R weighs 3100 lbs. A tuned lighter car will corner better and being faster on the curves means you can make up time that you lose on the straights. A technical course with very little straightaway will neuter HP advantage. And a M2 costs a lot more and has much more expensive running costs. The M2 also has limited rear seating and limited hauling capacity compared to a Type R.

    If we're taking value for money out of the equation, I guess we should all just get a McLaren.

    You could, in the interest of science, run a M2 with a cage and tires and see what kind of improvement you see. Otherwise, I'm just seeing sour grapes about a FF production car that costs 20k less and is faster around the 'Ring. M2 owners reaaaaaaaally hate that. I get spammed with so much wrong info when I point that out - people literally google and latch on to the first "bad" bit of info they think they find, most of which are wild claims by randos on the internet. Someone sent me a list of changes from the FK2 to the FK8 and said that was proof that the FK8 was a heavily modified track car and Honda was cheating, lol. When I pointed out that was a list of production changes, they did not offer an apology, just doubled down on, "they did something." I'll just take the world record run at face value.


     
    Captaindicki and wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  3. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    #18 Driveitlikeuboughtit, Sep 23, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
    Just curious - what kind of power were they saying the Honda was putting down? Did the M2 and FK8 run stock tires or the exact same tires as each other?

    Although I've heard that Sport Auto is heavily biased towards german manufacturers, a tie in that scenario is still impressive for the Type R.
     
    wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  4. wishistillhadmyITR

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    39
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    I’d drive one. I’m not salty, really, at all. You didn’t read my post (re I like FWD. I like the CTR, I think it’s fantastic). I’m not dissing your car. I’m happy with my purchase. Your happy with yours. I don’t care about the ‘Ring time. What I do care about is how much weight YOU specifically place in it given some unknown variables and then touting it as being superior to XYZ. You’re dense.

    And to comment, Laguna Seca is a technical course with minimal straights. That’s why I brought it into discussion (again you didn’t read my post, or you chose to ignore it). Nurburgring has got some long straights and long sweeping turns. The OG M2 actually has a poor top end.

    Also FYI to make sure to keep you honest since you’re complaining that others are googling. The OG M2 MT/DCT was 3454/3509lbs. Add about 140lbs for the M2C.

    Side note. Lots of manufacturers got salty about the GTR’s ring time (claiming cheating) and even Porsche with their professional drivers couldn’t replicate the time. Nissan then offered them driving school. Kinda funny.
     
  5. OP
    SI_honda_2k17

    SI_honda_2k17 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2018
    Posts:
    170
    Thanked:
    92
    Location:
    Can
    Car(s):
    Honda civic si
    The « ring » track is also almost 3 times lomger than the track used for the lightning lap. That explains your percentage difference
     
  6. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    I'm dense? Nice, bringing personal insults into this. I'm done with this. I've already pointed out the M2 has more HP and is faster in straights. You're just being salty about a published time. You can point out other times until you're blue in the face but the 'Ring is where the M2 loses. Period. The M2 is more expensive. Period.

    A base FK8 is technically 3042 pounds but I rounded to not be so pedantic. The M2 Comp is 3600 pounds and any form of M2 is a pig in comparison to the Type R, no matter how you slice it.
     
    wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  7. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    That is not how percentages work but that it is how an incremental advantage in cornering can cumulatively add up to a faster lap time.
     
    wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  8. wishistillhadmyITR

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    39
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    #23 wishistillhadmyITR, Sep 23, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
    It’s okay to bow out. You are dense because you still didn’t read my post. Don’t get butt hurt about being called dense. Not even an insult, just an observation bud.

    Edit/Sidenote: I had to look because I remember seeing some flagrant posts from you in the past. Pot calling kettle black, but you’ve hurled your fair share of insults at others on this forum. Stop displaying fanboyism and realize that there are other excellent platforms out there.
     
  9. baldheadracing

    baldheadracing Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,156
    Thanked:
    1,251
    Location:
    Canada's capital
    First Name:
    Craig
    Car(s):
    FK8
    The Type R in Sport Auto was on Cup2's (an 'option' in Germany), just like the car that ran the 'ring time.
     
  10. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    blah blah blah

    Not taking any weak internet bait, have fun in your slower M2 on the 'Ring.
     
  11. wishistillhadmyITR

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    39
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    It’s not bait, bud. I have YET to put down the CTR. You’re still bent out of shape, and yet so blinded that you cannot concede the positives to other drive-trains or cars. Not just the M2.

    The CTR is amazing. And, for the record once again, I like the way it looks and I’d drive one. Period.

    But I will give you this parting gift unless you choose to return. I will take a gander that the M2 is on average faster on most, if not all, road courses against the CTR. Save, your God, the ‘Ring.

    Can we be friends now?
     
  12. Driveitlikeuboughtit

    Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    709
    Thanked:
    478
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    Yes. Although the word you're looking for is obtuse - I don't have to engage with every one of your points, but that doesn't mean I didn't understand them (dense). I don't ever hate on cars to owners in real life - that's just lame. Everyone has a special spot in their heart for their hunk of junk and every car has something positive that can be said about it. I would not have minded a Focus RS I think - if the Type R wasn't on the market, I'd probably swing for one of those. If gas wasn't so expensive and poised to go higher, I'd have picked up a V8 monster of some sort. I like the way german cars drive too, but that comes at a cost.

    I'll continue to defend the CTR as the value of the century though and I'll gleefully point out where it punches above it's weight. It seats 4 adults and hauls a ton of crap! And it puts down the times it does on tracks! It's my daily, I'm almost 3k miles in and yeah I do look for excuses to take it for a spin. I love driving it and I absolutely think it's special at 35k - most people just don't know.
     
    doCTR, xbbnx and wishistillhadmyITR thanked this.
  13. wishistillhadmyITR

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    39
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    #28 wishistillhadmyITR, Sep 23, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2018
    No need to really defend the CTR, it’s an awesome car that will continue to shame cars many times its value. Also, having owned an RS, the CTR is the superior car and you made the right choice. The head gasket issue (such a pain in the ass to fix with American ford mechanics trying to fix a German built engine) and the ability to overheat the RDU truly scar the car. Regardless, the CTR consistently laps tracks faster than the RS.

    The RS is better in inclement weather. That’s about it.

    The true loser in this vehicle segment is the overpriced STi Type RA. Dated technology with bandaids on the engine and chassis. As a former ‘15 STi owner as well, I had higher hopes for this car.
     
  14. O Haiii

    O Haiii Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Posts:
    95
    Thanked:
    82
    Location:
    los angeles
    Car(s):
    acura
    Just stumbled across this thread. Sorry for bringing back from the dead.

    You have got to be delusional if you are comparing the CTR to the M2. Don't get me wrong, i am as big of a CTR fanboi as they come but the M2 has been regarded as the best driving BMW since the E46 M3 and one of the greatest BMWs ever made. Mind you, this is not my opinion. This is from countless publications and different media over many different countries. A car doesn't have to have the fastest ring time to be an amazing car. Does the ITR or the BMW 1M have great ring times? No. The truth is you will NEVER run the CTR thru the ring in 7:43 (if that figure turns out to be true altho seems very suspect), and even if you did, driving a properly balanced RWD car around a track is a league above driving a very well tuned FWD. Ive had my fair share of experience with different platforms. But despite the ITR being the best FWD ever built, my "twitchy rear-end" S2k, and or my "underpowered" miata was farrrr more enjoyable to drive than my ITR. Not even comparable.

    It seems like you like magazine racing. So let's do it. Forget the Ring time for now. Let's take some more easily accessible tracks so there is a bigger sample size. At the willow springs and laguna seca raceway where the Pros have posted laptimes in both the CTR and the M2, the M2 turns faster laptimes in the hands of pros. But this is not the important part. The important part is that at these tracks, some amateurs and semi pro drivers have turned in laptimes that are in the same neighborhood as the pros. So what does that mean? it means that those laptimes have some level of merit to them, since lots of different sources are turning in similar laptimes. However, even semi pros have had difficulty getting even close to the ring time that Honda achieved in the CTR. Not even CLOSE. Fishy? yes. But we give them the benefit of the doubt because fan boys only bring the Ring argument of the ctr when they feel like they have nothing else to brag about.

    Keep in mind that i own neither the M2 or the CTR. I have however driven both about the same amount being that someone close to me owns both and we like to take them both out and swap cars multiple times during each session. I am ALSO in the market for a CTR. I think the CTR is like you said the greatest sporty car bargain in a very long time. It punches above its weight, is one of the best driving cars you can buy for the money right now. I am NOT in the market for an M2. I have a bigger bias towards the CTR and i STILL think your arguments are retarded.

    As an enthusiast, you gotta give credit where credit is due. Is the M2 20k dollars better than the CTR? I personally don't know. But it's definitely the better driving car, regardless of laptimes.
     
  15. heavyD

    heavyD Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Posts:
    450
    Thanked:
    321
    Location:
    Calgary
    Car(s):
    2018 F87
    The Civic Type R ring car was not stock. End of story. It's a nice time but the car had a stripped interior, different tires and roll cage and who knows what other changes Honda isn't telling us about. The ring times are nice and all for bragging rights but they aren't sanctioned and manufactures can do whatever they want. Are we really naive enough to believe that manufacturers only cheat on emissions testing and covering defects?
     
    O Haiii thanked this.
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...