1. Guest, see the CivicX Forum Rules and User Agreement before posting.  After reading click here to dismiss this notice →
    Dismiss Notice

Featured C&D - Lightning lap 2018 : Civic Type R (With Video)

Discussion in 'Civic Type R Forum (FK8 - 10th Gen)' started by SI_honda_2k17, Sep 19, 2018.




  1. SI_honda_2k17

    SI_honda_2k17 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2018
    Posts:
    96
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    54
    Location:
    Can
    Car(s):
    Honda civic si
    https://www.caranddriver.com/features/2018-honda-civic-type-r-lightning-lap-2018

    3.03.9 !

    Full review and results:

    2018 Honda Civic Type R at Lightning Lap 2018
    That the Type R is a groundbreaking front-driver is clear from its lap time. But it's also a brilliantly rewarding car on a racetrack.

    Lap Time: 3:03.9
    Class: LL2 | Base Price: $35,595 | As-Tested Price: $35,595
    Power and Weight: 306 hp • 3116 lb • 10.2 lb/hp
    Tires: Continental SportContact 6, 245/30ZR-20 90Y


    It didn’t stand a chance. Fantastic though it is, Honda’s Civic Type R competes in LL2, the most cutthroat group in this contest. Its 3:03.9 is identical to the time set by the $6650 pricier Ford Focus RS in 2016, but the Honda simply wasn’t going to touch the class record, a 2:51.8 laid down by the 526-hp Ford Shelby Mustang GT350R that same year. If it were just $595 and a penny cheaper, it would own the LL1 record by 0.1 second over the V-6–powered Chevy Camaro 1LE. But the Type R’s $35,595 base price tips it into a higher echelon.

    Though it doesn’t earn class honors, that 3:03.9 still secures Honda a prestigious record: quickest front-wheel-drive car ever to run in this event. And it doesn’t just beat that nine-year-old record set by the—yes, really—turbocharged 2008 Chevy Cobalt SS, it annihilates it. By 9.1 seconds. To fully appreciate just how serious the Type R actually is, you need look no further than one rung down the Civic ladder, at the capable but pedestrian Civic Si, which last year ran only a 3:14.6.

    That the Civic Type R is a groundbreaking front-driver is clear from its lap time. That it’s also a brilliantly rewarding car on a racetrack is only obvious after multiple sessions. Perhaps its strong suit is its ability to endure a flogging. Like today’s best performance cars, it flourishes under intensifying stress. Its brakes and Continental SportContact 6 tires, which are its greatest assets, welcome ever-deeper braking points and more entry speed. And with a helical-gear limited-slip differential giving it an almost magical ability to put torque down while cornering, it endears itself to throttle-hungry drivers. The Type R enters Spiral and the infield esses faster than Porsche’s 718 Cayman GTS, and it exits the Climbing Esses faster than the Audi RS5.

    In the end, the Type R isn’t just a torch burning brightly for front-drive glory. It’s a first-order driver’s car that has rightly earned its place in the Lightning Lap record books. Honda is back.




    laptimes 2.jpg
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 22, 2018
    Meat Hammer thanked this.
  2. OP
    SI_honda_2k17

    SI_honda_2k17 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2018
    Posts:
    96
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    54
    Location:
    Can
    Car(s):
    Honda civic si
    They also tested the Accord 2.0t manual: 3.18.4 sec

    Beat the subaru wrx sti ra by a full second

    For the record, same track:
    SI 2017: 3.14.6
    SI 2012: 3.24.1
    SI 2008 mugen: 3.24.8
    SI 2007: 3.25.5
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2018
    2tone, Remm, Meat Hammer and 2 others thanked this.
  3. Zeffy94

    Zeffy94 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2017
    Posts:
    327
    Thanked:
    216
    Location:
    Doylestown, PA
    Car(s):
    2018 Honda Civic Type R
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    The only thing in the Type R’s class that beat it was the Mustang GT with the performance pack 2. That’s impressive. This is such a good car I’m almost every measure.
     
  4. Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    412
    Thanked:
    277
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    GT w/ Performance Pack 2 is $44.5k and includes super sticky barely road legal tires.
     
  5. boosted180sx Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Posts:
    1,930
    Thanked:
    1,534
    Location:
    torrance, ca
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR, 2019 370Z Nismo, '16 ILX
    yeah. the price as tested was 52k w/ 305 sized Pilot Sport Cup 2s lol.
     
    Meat Hammer thanked this.
  6. Zooropa82

    Zooropa82 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2016
    Posts:
    4,306
    Featured Threads:
    5
    Thanked:
    3,085
    Location:
    PA
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX-T(Sold) 2017 CRV EX - 2018 Impreza Sport w/Eyesight
    WOW, Cayman GTS...
     
    neteng101 thanked this.
  7. heavyD Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Posts:
    402
    Thanked:
    286
    Location:
    Calgary
    Car(s):
    2018 F87 M2
    I see some posters here say the Type R is faster than an M2. Don't get me wrong that's a fantastic time but it's two full seconds slower than an M2 around that track. Still very impressive at it has to be the lowest priced car to ever that close to 3 minutes.
     
  8. RacingManiac Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2018
    Posts:
    165
    Thanked:
    94
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    First Name:
    Jen
    Car(s):
    2016 VW GTI, 2018 ABM CTR R-17001
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    C&D noted the TypeR's base price is high enough to push it into LL2 which means the fastest car they've tested in the class was the GT350R(LL2 is 35k to 65k or something). Which is unfortunate because it would be the fastest LL1 car(34,999 is the limit), which is the V6 1LE Camaro...
     
  9. UFO CTR

    UFO CTR Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2016
    Posts:
    2,103
    Thanked:
    1,605
    Location:
    San Frrancisco, CA
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR#1348
    Dang, now I really want to see a head to head comparison btwn the CTR and the M2. I think it will be a great shoot out!
     
  10. wishistillhadmyITR Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    38
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    Same time as the Focus RS. I was almost positive it’d be faster.
     
  11. Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    412
    Thanked:
    277
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    It's because the M2, M2 comp and Z4 are slower than the Type R around the 'Ring. A lot slower. You know, the 20k cheaper Type R.

    Lightning Laps are interesting but I don't put a lot of stock in amateur drivers trying to maximize performance. Maybe as a group they just don't know how to drive a FF car as well as RWD/AWD? Plus tires - the primo brands come with primo rubber. Our stock contis are nice, but they're not as nice as the nicest Michelins.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
  12. Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    412
    Thanked:
    277
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    If they had done the test in 2017, it would have qualified for the LL1 "class." MSRP was under $35k including destination when the car was launched.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
  13. wishistillhadmyITR Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Posts:
    38
    Thanked:
    25
    Location:
    SD
    First Name:
    d
    Car(s):
    Focus RS (former 00' Si, PYITR 0081, Evo VIII, IX, 15' WRX STi)
    And if it were the opposite, I’d say you wouldn’t be as critical about their methods.

    From Jalopnik.
    “Honda set the lap time with what they call a “pre-production model that was technically representative of production specification.” A floating roll cage was added for safety reasons, but Honda claims that the cage did not improve the rigidity of the frame. In order to compensate for the extra weight of the roll cage, Honda removed the rear seats and display audio system. The record-setting Type R was also outfitted with street-legal track focused tires. Honda declined to specify the actual tires used.”

    This breeds some uncertainty as to what the true production model would do. Always the apologist that you are...
     
    RODSCIVIC and leehom thanked this.
  14. RODSCIVIC

    RODSCIVIC Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Posts:
    1,001
    Thanked:
    828
    Location:
    SoCal
    Car(s):
    2015 Acura MDX 2016 Focus ST 2018 Si Sedan
    Here are the times for STI, RS and CTR

    3D3120A5-D314-4B33-A64B-A558BD76DF5D.jpeg
     
    Meat Hammer thanked this.
  15. Driveitlikeuboughtit Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2018
    Posts:
    412
    Thanked:
    277
    Location:
    TN
    Car(s):
    2018 CW CTR
    So many pointed comments directed towards me from non-owners. I think you guys are just jelly - of course I'm going to gush about the Type R on a Type R forum.

    Amateur drivers are amateurs for a reason. They don't know how to wring out the last bit of performance out of a car, they're unlikely to shift and drive with the laser like consistency a pro can bring to the equation.

    I don't know why so many M2 people hang out here. Yeah, the M2 has 365-400 hp compared to 306 from the Honda. It's going to win 0-60 and in a straight line. It loses ground to the Type R on corners. You all are so touchy about your much more expensive cars that are slower around the Nurburgring. Like a lot slower.

    You can cry about a roll cage (for safety) and tires all you want to, it still counts as a production FF world record. Let me know when a M2 with tires (even though the stock tires on a M2 are already superior to a Type R's tires) and a roll cage puts down a time even close to the Type R record with tires and a safety cage. The M2 comp has 40 more horsepower and bigger brakes than the M2 and all that means a 4 second faster time than a M2 around the 'Ring at 7:54.

    A M2 runs the 'Ring at 7:58 - that's 15 seconds slower than a Type R, which runs it at 7:43 or 463 seconds. That margin is about 3% of the time, compared to the 1% margin on the C&D Test. Less margin means confounding variables like poor driving and weather and track conditions play a larger role.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
Loading...

Share This Page