- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 217
- Location
- Arizona
- Vehicle(s)
- WRX and M5
- Banned
- #31
That’s exactly it. I don’t track my car so I don’t want the added performance for example...assuming you’re correct and it adds performance. I don’t want it and I don’t want to pay for it, and I may not be the only one. There are definite drawbacks for daily driving on smf vs dmf just like there are benefits to smf in racing applications. If there weren’t any disadvantages to dailying on a smf every manufacturer would use smf which are cheaper anyway.You may be right about peak hp. Though i. Really doubt it really effects peak hp too much.
I speak from putting smf on multiple of my cars over the years. And the added benefit of a free revving engine has always been the what ive seen coming from doing that mod.
These dfm's are far timo heavy in these cars. 36lbs is just to much for a 1.5t engine. You can feel it if you turn your engine off to quickly after running it. Or by the rev hang you still feel even after tuning it.
Show me one track car with a dmf setup if you honestly think they are better performers
I don’t have any rev hang. It’s been custom tuned out.
It was like 4-5whp if I remember. And you need to comprehend better what you read. Read slower perhaps, or more than once. I did not say dmf performs better. But the single most important reason smf is used in racing is cuz it’s direct and harder to destroy under cont power/shifting and race conditions. BUT also a direct effect/result of this formerly mention benefit (smf being one solid mass) is added nvh.
Sponsored
Last edited: