Featured 2019 Honda Civic's new Sport trim starts at $21,150

  1. jred721

    jred721 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2018
    Posts:
    799
    Thanked:
    403
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    First Name:
    James
    Car(s):
    '18 Honda Civic EX, '18 BMW M550i, '13 Mercedes ML350
    A lot of people are complaining about the sport trim having the 2.0L or even making fun of it, but keep in mind that this is nothing new for Honda. For example, the last gen Accord had a "sport" trim that had the 2.4L engine and not the V6, which make the EX-L and touring versions of the Accord way faster and it sold well and I didn't see anyone complain. This is just a marketing decision by Honda and "sport" just means nicer wheels and exterior looks so they can move more Civics.
     
  2. dallasjhawk

    dallasjhawk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    3,178
    Thanked:
    3,079
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX-T, 2004 Acura TSX
    I dont think anyone is making fun of the 2.0 moreso making fun of 1 member who claims the 2.0 is the greatest thing since sliced bread and comparing it to an Si. The engine is fine for what it is. Ive owned and Accord Sport and the only thing sporty about it was the 18" wheels and the paddle shifters.
     
  3. coo1rim

    coo1rim Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Posts:
    943
    Thanked:
    236
    Occupation:
    driver
    Location:
    toronto
    Car(s):
    1998 civic, 2006 yaris, 2008 rav4, 2012 carmy, 2017 Civic LX
    It is the greatest thing since sliced bread!
     
  4. coo1rim

    coo1rim Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Posts:
    943
    Thanked:
    236
    Occupation:
    driver
    Location:
    toronto
    Car(s):
    1998 civic, 2006 yaris, 2008 rav4, 2012 carmy, 2017 Civic LX
    No comparisons. A 2.0L base Civic (6mt) will easily outdrive 2.4L accord Sport. Power to weight is probably similar, but driving dynamic isn't.

    This new Sports Sedan model is like putting back the missing link. 2.0L was purposely handicapped to make the 1.5T shine. I suspect Honda is tired of this marketing scheme. It's probably not obvious for 1.5T owners and I was in the same boat when I first purchased. But, after living with this car for 60k, it's obvious it's not getting the sporting credit it deserves. 2019 Sports model is a step in the right and actually doing away of a marketing scam that was already in place.
     
  5. jred721

    jred721 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2018
    Posts:
    799
    Thanked:
    403
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    First Name:
    James
    Car(s):
    '18 Honda Civic EX, '18 BMW M550i, '13 Mercedes ML350
    Not trying to reboot the 2.0 vs. 1.5 topic again lol, I meant "making fun" in a lighter sense of things for people who are disappointed there isnt a 1.5 for the sport trim (which is fine). All im saying is as you mentioned, the accord sport was just an exterior upgrade with no actual performance benefits, much like the new civic sport is going to be and thats just Honda's marketing decision.
     
  6. dallasjhawk

    dallasjhawk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    3,178
    Thanked:
    3,079
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX-T, 2004 Acura TSX
    Honestly, its going to sell like hot cakes man. People eat that stuff up. Especially first time buyers to the honda brand or those that dont research. But by stealing the SI tip and wheels for the Sport, I bet the SI is getting a nice update as well to keep it looking different than the sport
     
  7. coo1rim

    coo1rim Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Posts:
    943
    Thanked:
    236
    Occupation:
    driver
    Location:
    toronto
    Car(s):
    1998 civic, 2006 yaris, 2008 rav4, 2012 carmy, 2017 Civic LX
    I guess I can't complain, got a great deal on my LX sedan without paying serious premiums for a 1.5T.

    In the US, If you're after a 6mt 1.5T, EX-T makes a lot of sense. However, here in Canada, that setup can only be had as an Si for $33700 (after tax).

    I better let the 2.0 vs 1.5t debate die, might end up having them jack up the price on 2.0L Civics vs having the 1.5T model pay the premium.
     
  8. dallasjhawk

    dallasjhawk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    3,178
    Thanked:
    3,079
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX-T, 2004 Acura TSX
    An Si in the US can be had for $22,500 OTD. mutliple users have confirmed thats what they paid. If you are really about the performance, paying a couple grand more for a far superior car is definitely worth it and the SI will wipe the floor with that lx
     
    xbbnx thanked this.
  9. coo1rim

    coo1rim Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Posts:
    943
    Thanked:
    236
    Occupation:
    driver
    Location:
    toronto
    Car(s):
    1998 civic, 2006 yaris, 2008 rav4, 2012 carmy, 2017 Civic LX
    You guys are getting a great deal on the Si with the low Canadian dollar and free trade. Us Canadians are Happy with the perks we're getting for the LX. If you convert what I paid for my LX, into US dollars, it cost $16k. Canadian LX comes standard with all the right stuff, like the heated seat, climate control and 7' centre info system. So, have at the Si, we're good over here.
     
  10. Dying2Live

    Dying2Live Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2018
    Posts:
    352
    Thanked:
    145
    Location:
    Lakewood Ca
    Car(s):
    2018 LX Sedan Manual
    #25 Dying2Live, Oct 3, 2018
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2018
    somehow hondas decision to slap on the hdmi exhaust brings out the hideous rear fake vents even more
     
    Nessism thanked this.
  11. Markdog

    Markdog Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Posts:
    46
    Thanked:
    36
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic Touring, 2010 Civic LXS, 2007 Civic EX
    If you know Honda the sport model means mid cycle extra value model. That is all it means.
     
  12. joshhjackson2112

    joshhjackson2112 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2018
    Posts:
    202
    Thanked:
    97
    Location:
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    First Name:
    Josh
    Car(s):
    18' SI
    They sure didnt put much effort making 16-18 SI look different than civic touring. Still trying to teach my family the difference. :confused:
     
  13. dallasjhawk

    dallasjhawk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    3,178
    Thanked:
    3,079
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    Car(s):
    2016 Civic EX-T, 2004 Acura TSX
    Its always just been wheels and different front and rear fascia on the outside which were different than the touring.
     
  14. coopermidnight

    coopermidnight Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2016
    Posts:
    533
    Thanked:
    590
    Occupation:
    Software developer
    Location:
    Florida
    First Name:
    Brandon
    Car(s):
    FC1 Si
    What gets me is the inconsistency within the Civic lineup alone, assuming they don't change much for the MY19 hatch. The entire hatch line has the 1.5T with the "sport" trims getting a single digit HP boost, but the 1.5T is an upgrade path for the sedans and coupes and their "sport" trim has a 2.0 identical to that of the LX. It's obviously selling well, so no point fixing what's not broken, but the mental map of the trims is stupid-looking nonetheless.
     
  15. coo1rim

    coo1rim Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Posts:
    943
    Thanked:
    236
    Occupation:
    driver
    Location:
    toronto
    Car(s):
    1998 civic, 2006 yaris, 2008 rav4, 2012 carmy, 2017 Civic LX
    In Canada, makes sense that Sport model is only offered as a CVT since it just needs to look the part. Once again, better to the upgrades yourself.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...