0-100 MPH-0 time?

[FifStreet]

Does anybody know the 0-100 MPH - 0 time for the CTR?

Sponsored

 

[willskiGT]

From C&D's 2017 test:

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15090975/2017-honda-civic-type-r-test-review/

0-100 mph: 11.5s
Braking from 70mph: 142 ft.

From that, you can back-calculate deceleration rate (~11.31 m/s^2) and thus the time to brake from 100-0mph, which is 3.95s.

So, ideal conditions and immediate braking at 100 mph = 15.45s for 0-100-0.

 

[Vincent@27WON]

You can test that with some equipment options like an AIM Solo or Dragy.

 

[FifStreet]

what the heck difference does it make?

trying to be "cool" and brag to your buddies?

I'm noticing that stat being used to compare some performance cars, and honestly I think its a better stat than 0-60 or quarter mile.

Alex on Autos just did a review on the Shelby 500 and was using that stat to show the different between that car and a hellcat. I was curious what the CTR might be.

I don't need to brag to anyone. That's why I am cool.

 

[SilentMonkCTR]

what the heck difference does it make?

trying to be "cool" and brag to your buddies?

Ahh yes. CivicX at its finest. A performance question on a performance built car met with belittling.

From C&D's 2017 test:

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15090975/2017-honda-civic-type-r-test-review/

0-100 mph: 11.5s
Braking from 70mph: 142 ft.

From that, you can back-calculate deceleration rate and thus the time to brake from 100-0mph, which is 3.95s.

So, ideal conditions and immediate braking at 100 mph = 15.45s for 0-100-0.

 

[hpbyhermann]

Ahh yes. CivicX at its finest. A performance question on a performance built car met with belittling.

Unfortunate but true.

 

[Zeffy94]

From C&D's 2017 test:

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15090975/2017-honda-civic-type-r-test-review/

0-100 mph: 11.5s
Braking from 70mph: 142 ft.

From that, you can back-calculate deceleration rate (~11.31 m/s^2) and thus the time to brake from 100-0mph, which is 3.95s.

So, ideal conditions and immediate braking at 100 mph = 15.45s for 0-100-0.

Maybe YOU can calculate the deceleration rate but that’s too much math for me

Thankfully people like you do the hard work for us

 

[CivilciviC]

From C&D's 2017 test:

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15090975/2017-honda-civic-type-r-test-review/

0-100 mph: 11.5s
Braking from 70mph: 142 ft.

From that, you can back-calculate deceleration rate (~11.31 m/s^2) and thus the time to brake from 100-0mph, which is 3.95s.

So, ideal conditions and immediate braking at 100 mph = 15.45s for 0-100-0.

I wonder how much time can be cut off with better tires.

 

[willskiGT]

I wonder how much time can be cut off with better tires.

Maybe a tenth or two - https://www.caranddriver.com/review...with-michelin-pilot-sport-cup-2-tires-review/

Granted the FoRS is already AWD, so stickier tires won't help much with the launch, but I don't think it would make a huge difference.

Sponsored