Practical Justifications for the Type R

RedGiant217

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
687
Reaction score
420
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2001 Honda Accord
Country flag
I won't be able to haul around any 4x8 sheets of Plywood or 8' 2x4s but that is ok... I can always rent a Home Depot Flat bed.
I was able to "fit" an 8' 2X10 with the hatch closed. Just used a towel to protect the dash and a plastic bag to protect the passenger's seat. Probably wasn't safe but I didn't die.
Thought I'd point it out since we're talking about practicality.
:headbang:
Sponsored

 

charleswrivers

Senior Member
First Name
Charles
Joined
Nov 3, 2017
Threads
43
Messages
3,736
Reaction score
4,468
Location
Kingsland, GA
Vehicle(s)
'14 Odyssey, '94 300zx, 2001 F-150
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
Depends on your point of view...

Comparing it to a sport hatch that costs a little more than 1/2 what a CTR costs... burns 2/3 the fuel... with tire costs substantially less over the lifetime while seating one more... it doesn't make much sense.

If you're looking at other performance cars however... when looking back at the relatively low cost of entry and very functional 2+2 for seating 4 adults with hatchback storage... while matching or beating other dedicated sportscars for far less money to buy and maintain while likely being very reliable long-term... it makes sense.

It's all in how you compare it. Depending on how do so can make it seem ridiculous and frivolous or a bargain.
 
OP
OP
Simmons572

Simmons572

Member
First Name
Regi
Joined
May 10, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
33
Reaction score
35
Location
AL
Vehicle(s)
20 RR FK8 R-37732, 96 Civic LX
Country flag
Car is super practical in my opinion. 4 doors, excellent handling, pay for civic insurance and civic repairs but get double the performance. And the Cargo area with seats down is 5 ft deep or just as deep as many full size trucks. Sometimes I like to see how far I can push it.

20190625_123747.jpg
Honestly, this right here is one of the most exciting things about the car for me. It's a fast and fun car, but it can do that.

With your number of passengers, it can be practical, however as some have mentioned there is a cost to making it so. On top of the smaller rims + bigger tires, you probably want to consider the spare tire kit.

Let's be honest though, practicality is not why we like the Type R, nor is it what it was designed for. If the added expenses are something you are comfortable with, then by all means go for it if it makes sense to you. Otherwise you may have a more practical car that you look at every day and wonder what could have been :)
Great point with the spare tire kit. Definitely looking into that.

Depends on your point of view...

Comparing it to a sport hatch that costs a little more than 1/2 what a CTR costs... burns 2/3 the fuel... with tire costs substantially less over the lifetime while seating one more... it doesn't make much sense.

If you're looking at other performance cars however... when looking back at the relatively low cost of entry and very functional 2+2 for seating 4 adults with hatchback storage... while matching or beating other dedicated sportscars for far less money to buy and maintain while likely being very reliable long-term... it makes sense.

It's all in how you compare it. Depending on how do so can make it seem ridiculous and frivolous or a bargain.
Don't get me wrong folks, I know I will be getting this car because it is fun, and because it's a freaking Type R. A fun car is a fun car, and should be treated as such. But since I am considering this vehicle becoming my new daily driver, my practical side kicks in.

I could just get the sport hatch and be done with it. But I also acknowledge that if I don't get the Type R, I am going to regret it.

Thanks for all of the input folks. :)
 

willskiGT

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
314
Reaction score
190
Location
Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2019 Civic Type R #26262
Country flag
Agreed, the CTR is not a practical car. A basic Civic Hatch of any form will be more practical than the CTR by far.

However, if you have the extra money and want to have something that's fun and handles really damn well.... then go for it.

I personally justified it because I'm a car person. I didn't really want to pay anything over $40k for a vehicle, and I like light and sporty/good handling cars... The CTR lands on those points squarely. Ultimately, I knew it wasn't stretching my budget, I could easily afford it, and I would have been disappointed in any other car that was out there around that price point when I purchased in early '18.
I think it's all relative.

The Civic Type R is (for me) an extremely practical car. I can seat 4 adults comfortably with all their belongings. It's got a huge hatch/trunk area, which is even larger when you fold down the seats. Suspension is nice and compliant in Comfort, the car gets 30mpg on the highway (and still averages around 24mpg in mixed driving), and has a modern infotainment suite. It's extremely cheap to maintain/service and insurance is shockingly cheap (I pay around $475 for 6 months).

I was cross shopping the CTR with used GT350s, V8 Vantages, Camaro Z/28, and Lotus Elise/Exiges. Those cars (the Lotuses in particular) are more of what I would call impractical cars. They get atrocious gas mileage, have poor visibility, no storage space, servicing and insurance costs are insane.

The line between practical/impractical for me is when the car is difficult/not fun to daily drive, but obviously that line is different for everyone.
 

R-10552

Senior Member
First Name
Russ
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
235
Reaction score
229
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2021 Acura RDX Aspec, 2019 Civic Si (wife's)
Country flag
From a cargo space perspective, I do not think you can get a more practical car that has similar performance to the TypeR for the price. If you start factoring in maintenance and running costs then things get worse for it. But who cares about that?! You're driving a TypeR!

But I will say this: If you want a TypeR do not settle for the sport hatch (as long as you can afford the TypeR). You will regret it and it will end up costing you more in the long run if you can't get the TypeR out of your head and you end up upgrading later. I've done that with so many cars in the past. Just get what you want.
 


MonkeyConQueso

Senior Member
First Name
Armand
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
390
Reaction score
255
Location
Seattle
Vehicle(s)
2017 CTR
Country flag
I think it's all relative.

The Civic Type R is (for me) an extremely practical car. I can seat 4 adults comfortably with all their belongings. It's got a huge hatch/trunk area, which is even larger when you fold down the seats. Suspension is nice and compliant in Comfort, the car gets 30mpg on the highway (and still averages around 24mpg in mixed driving), and has a modern infotainment suite. It's extremely cheap to maintain/service and insurance is shockingly cheap (I pay around $475 for 6 months).

I was cross shopping the CTR with used GT350s, V8 Vantages, Camaro Z/28, and Lotus Elise/Exiges. Those cars (the Lotuses in particular) are more of what I would call impractical cars. They get atrocious gas mileage, have poor visibility, no storage space, servicing and insurance costs are insane.

The line between practical/impractical for me is when the car is difficult/not fun to daily drive, but obviously that line is different for everyone.
Agreed, it's totally relative, and that it's a self imposed practicality level.

I mean, it's totally practical in comparison to coupes and other sports vehicles, but... it's still not really a practical vehicle in comparison to vehicles of it's same chassis type. I fully appreciate that the CTR has cargo room, seats for 4, and a comfort mode that makes Seattle streets barely bearable. But in reality if I wanted JUST a practical vehicle I would have chosen something with an automatic transmission, easy for me and passengers to get in and out of, room for 5, better gas mileage, didn't require premium gas, and a body styling I didn't care if it got dinged while street parked. Overall, the CTR is not a "Practical" car.

All that being said... I still love this damn car, and I wouldn't trade it for anything right now. It's one of the two practical vehicles I could have chosen from the list I was interested in as well.
 

Driveitlikeuboughtit

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Threads
84
Messages
876
Reaction score
588
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2018 CW CTR
Country flag
Someone else nailed it - it's an incredibly practical car for the performance and it's class. Compared to 2 seaters or even other hot hatches, it has an incredible amount of interior volume, class leading fuel economy, seats 4 adults comfortably, low maintenance requirements, low insurance, etc.

The unique balance of performance and practicality is a major reason why I chose the R.
 

Zeffy94

Senior Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Mar 26, 2017
Threads
77
Messages
1,850
Reaction score
1,487
Location
Doylestown, PA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mazda3 GT Hatch 6AT, 2018 Honda Civic Type R (traded in)
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
From a cargo space perspective, I do not think you can get a more practical car that has similar performance to the TypeR for the price. If you start factoring in maintenance and running costs then things get worse for it. But who cares about that?! You're driving a TypeR!

But I will say this: If you want a TypeR do not settle for the sport hatch (as long as you can afford the TypeR). You will regret it and it will end up costing you more in the long run if you can't get the TypeR out of your head and you end up upgrading later. I've done that with so many cars in the past. Just get what you want.
Maintenance and running costs completely caught me off guard. Much higher than I expected, although some is my own doing.

The car is practical, but after living with it for about 18 months I do think as a daily driver in certain areas it falls short. Uneven roads are a nightmare in terms of ride comfort, and that’s a majority of my commute (thanks PA!). Comfort mode helps, but the nerfed throttle pedal response sucks. The other issue is when you’re in traffic and you have to constantly shuffle gears, because pretty much below 2k RPM the engine feels gutless. I always try to keep the car above 2k RPM for that reason (and because auto rev match works too then).

Find the perfect road though and this car shines. The question then becomes how often you find those roads though. I know with the increased construction in my area as well as school starting back up there’s more traffic on the roads which dampens the experience.
 

boosted180sx

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Threads
25
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
5,088
Location
torrance, ca
Vehicle(s)
2017 CTR, 2016 ILX
Country flag
Maintenance and running costs completely caught me off guard. Much higher than I expected, although some is my own doing.

The car is practical, but after living with it for about 18 months I do think as a daily driver in certain areas it falls short. Uneven roads are a nightmare in terms of ride comfort, and that’s a majority of my commute (thanks PA!). Comfort mode helps, but the nerfed throttle pedal response sucks. The other issue is when you’re in traffic and you have to constantly shuffle gears, because pretty much below 2k RPM the engine feels gutless. I always try to keep the car above 2k RPM for that reason (and because auto rev match works too then).

Find the perfect road though and this car shines. The question then becomes how often you find those roads though. I know with the increased construction in my area as well as school starting back up there’s more traffic on the roads which dampens the experience.
maintenance isn't too different ...
pad and tire wear all depends on what compound you use. You use a cheap compound like what they come in the regular civics and downsize the wheels, the cost isn't that different.

only thing that the car consumes more of is fuel.

Also, you can sit in comfort mode with increased throttle response if you have a tuning unit :p and having to constantly row through gears is a problem no matter what car you are in if its a MT.
 

willskiGT

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
314
Reaction score
190
Location
Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2019 Civic Type R #26262
Country flag
Maintenance and running costs completely caught me off guard. Much higher than I expected, although some is my own doing.

The car is practical, but after living with it for about 18 months I do think as a daily driver in certain areas it falls short. Uneven roads are a nightmare in terms of ride comfort, and that’s a majority of my commute (thanks PA!). Comfort mode helps, but the nerfed throttle pedal response sucks. The other issue is when you’re in traffic and you have to constantly shuffle gears, because pretty much below 2k RPM the engine feels gutless. I always try to keep the car above 2k RPM for that reason (and because auto rev match works too then).

Find the perfect road though and this car shines. The question then becomes how often you find those roads though. I know with the increased construction in my area as well as school starting back up there’s more traffic on the roads which dampens the experience.
The only high cost on these cars is the tires. Oil changes, brake pads/rotors, etc. are all crazy cheap compared to other performance cars with similar performance.

I've had several B7 RS4s (similar performance, better sound), and you would pass out if you saw the repair bills. 4 new rotors all around is ~$1500. Oil change from the dealership is at least 3x as expensive as the Type R. The suspension has cross-linked, hydraulic lines between the dampers. If it goes out, the cost to repair is $2-3k (or just put on a new set of coilovers). There are even more common issues (carbon buildup, injector failure, etc), but the car is actually fairly reliable, just really expensive to run. The CTR is super cheap, comparatively.
 


Chee_hu

Senior Member
First Name
Sherwin
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Threads
2
Messages
934
Reaction score
747
Location
Elk Grove, California
Vehicle(s)
#611 Rallye Red CTR | 1998 Civic EX | 2007 Honda Fit Sport
Country flag
Very practical IMO. MPG can average 30+ if you're not always in R mode and have the pedal down to the floor. Use it for long road trips with our 110 pound German Shepherd in the back comfortably along with our bags with space to spare.
 

tinyman392

Senior Member
First Name
Marcus
Joined
May 21, 2018
Threads
14
Messages
3,265
Reaction score
2,082
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
'18 Civic Type R (RR)
Country flag
Maintenance and running costs completely caught me off guard. Much higher than I expected, although some is my own doing.

The car is practical, but after living with it for about 18 months I do think as a daily driver in certain areas it falls short. Uneven roads are a nightmare in terms of ride comfort, and that’s a majority of my commute (thanks PA!). Comfort mode helps, but the nerfed throttle pedal response sucks. The other issue is when you’re in traffic and you have to constantly shuffle gears, because pretty much below 2k RPM the engine feels gutless. I always try to keep the car above 2k RPM for that reason (and because auto rev match works too then).

Find the perfect road though and this car shines. The question then becomes how often you find those roads though. I know with the increased construction in my area as well as school starting back up there’s more traffic on the roads which dampens the experience.
I haven't noticed any maintenance cost differences. The only thing that would come to mind would be the brake pads and rotors that might be slightly higher. Running costs is definitely going to be in gas since it's not the most fuel efficient (but I would't say it isn't fuel efficient either) and you have to get premium, more or less.

You're having issues with comfort, and with the stock setup on the CTR, I agree with you. It's not bad bad, but it's not good either. Swap to 18" wheels and it'll get rid of the issue almost entirely. Plus if you go to a light setup (around 20-ish lbs per wheel) it'll also be faster, have a better tire selection, and possibly cheaper tires too! ;)

If you want auto rev match to work below 2000 RPM, downshift 2+ gears. The rev match is a little slower though, but if you want to speed it up, blip the throttle while you're moving the gear lever ;)
 

Zeffy94

Senior Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Mar 26, 2017
Threads
77
Messages
1,850
Reaction score
1,487
Location
Doylestown, PA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mazda3 GT Hatch 6AT, 2018 Honda Civic Type R (traded in)
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
I haven't noticed any maintenance cost differences. The only thing that would come to mind would be the brake pads and rotors that might be slightly higher. Running costs is definitely going to be in gas since it's not the most fuel efficient (but I would't say it isn't fuel efficient either) and you have to get premium, more or less.

You're having issues with comfort, and with the stock setup on the CTR, I agree with you. It's not bad bad, but it's not good either. Swap to 18" wheels and it'll get rid of the issue almost entirely. Plus if you go to a light setup (around 20-ish lbs per wheel) it'll also be faster, have a better tire selection, and possibly cheaper tires too! ;)

If you want auto rev match to work below 2000 RPM, downshift 2+ gears. The rev match is a little slower though, but if you want to speed it up, blip the throttle while you're moving the gear lever ;)
It’s mostly fuel, and the fact that tires are SO damn expensive (cheaping out for what the car is feels wrong). I’m almost to 29 MPG combined (per the dashboard) and I still have to fill up once a week.

I considered the swap to 18s but then not only would I need new wheels I would need ANOTHER set of new tires for them. Rather not spending a couple grand for a while.

But yeah, comfort mode helps with the craptastic roads in PA but you can still feel a lot of the vibrations make their way into the cabin. On the plus side, hitting potholes doesn’t quite sound like I just blew an entire axle up.
 

tinyman392

Senior Member
First Name
Marcus
Joined
May 21, 2018
Threads
14
Messages
3,265
Reaction score
2,082
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
'18 Civic Type R (RR)
Country flag
It’s mostly fuel, and the fact that tires are SO damn expensive (cheaping out for what the car is feels wrong). I’m almost to 29 MPG combined (per the dashboard) and I still have to fill up once a week.

I considered the swap to 18s but then not only would I need new wheels I would need ANOTHER set of new tires for them. Rather not spending a couple grand for a while.

But yeah, comfort mode helps with the craptastic roads in PA but you can still feel a lot of the vibrations make their way into the cabin. On the plus side, hitting potholes doesn’t quite sound like I just blew an entire axle up.
depending on tire size for the new wheels, they could also pay for themselves after a set or two compared to stock.
 

Dipz

Senior Member
First Name
Dipz
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
151
Reaction score
62
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
'19 Type R
Country flag
What color you thinking of? :)
Sponsored

 


 


Top