Good BPV?

Akuto

Senior Member
First Name
Taylor
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
325
Reaction score
174
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
19 Civic Type R, 01 C5 Corvette, 12 Audi TTRS
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
Looking for a good BPV, not entirely a fan of the rubber diaphragm in the stock BPV for more than stock boost. What do you guys recommend? Not looking for BOV, since my research on those typically give us more lag and decrease power and responsiveness.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
Akuto

Akuto

Senior Member
First Name
Taylor
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
325
Reaction score
174
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
19 Civic Type R, 01 C5 Corvette, 12 Audi TTRS
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
:bump:

Im surprised not one has had any input on this
 

360glitch

Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Threads
108
Messages
4,710
Reaction score
4,874
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Accord Sport 2.0T, 2017 Si Sedan (Sold), 2017 Sport Hatchback (Sold)
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
:bump:

Im surprised not one has had any input on this
Do you have reason to believe the factory BPV is not holding pressure at increased boost levels?
 

Hollywoo0220

Customer Service oriented (most of the time) :-)
First Name
RJ
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Threads
5
Messages
744
Reaction score
524
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
Dihatsu Charade, BMW, Various Hondas, Focus ST, and VW GTI
Country flag
A prominent tuner stated that “there is not an issue” with the stock BPV leaking - even at 31PSI.
 

hobby-man

Senior Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Threads
50
Messages
2,867
Reaction score
2,739
Location
GTA
Vehicle(s)
2021 WRX STi, 2018 Sport Touring Hatchback (sold)
Build Thread
Link
Country flag
A prominent tuner stated that “there is not an issue” with the stock BPV leaking - even at 31PSI.
Came here to say the same. A new BPV might look nice as some extra bling but no way the stock one is limiting unless it's defective
 


OP
OP
Akuto

Akuto

Senior Member
First Name
Taylor
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
325
Reaction score
174
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
19 Civic Type R, 01 C5 Corvette, 12 Audi TTRS
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
Do you have reason to believe the factory BPV is not holding pressure at increased boost levels?
.
My reason is, over time, the rubber diaphragm in higher boost and with heat may cause it to leak or malfunction faster than a metal one. I've seen how they wear down faster and I typically recommend a metal one, I work with motors, pumps and piping and see rubber ones go out fairly quickly. I know it's not too serious for the cars, but I'd still like to change it out. I'm more upgrading little things that may go out sooner than other pieces. I do this with all my cars since I like to fiddle
 

bbdave

Senior Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Threads
6
Messages
247
Reaction score
166
Location
Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2018 Honda Civic Type R
Country flag
@Akuto for fun I got the Boomba BPV, no issues been running for almost 10k miles
Installation was a pain. Do it when the engine is fully cooled.
 
OP
OP
Akuto

Akuto

Senior Member
First Name
Taylor
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
325
Reaction score
174
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
19 Civic Type R, 01 C5 Corvette, 12 Audi TTRS
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
@Akuto for fun I got the Boomba BPV, no issues been running for almost 10k miles
Installation was a pain. Do it when the engine is fully cooled.
I was thinking the same one and yeah, I've installed one on my buddy's car, it was mostly a tight squeeze and dropping shit :yes::banghead:
 

AZCivicX

Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
15
Reaction score
9
Location
AZ
Vehicle(s)
2017 Civic Coupe EX-T
Country flag
@Akuto for fun I got the Boomba BPV, no issues been running for almost 10k miles
Installation was a pain. Do it when the engine is fully cooled.
sorry to bring up an old post, but I’ve been trying to find sound clips for the Boomba BPV. I’ll admit... I mostly want the Boomba BPV for the sound considering the stock BPV is capable. In your opinion does the Boomba BPV give a better/different sound?
 

bbdave

Senior Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Threads
6
Messages
247
Reaction score
166
Location
Georgia
Vehicle(s)
2018 Honda Civic Type R
Country flag
@AZCivicX I assume you are looking for your Coupe. Not trying to be mean, but you did post in the type R forum. I’m not sure what the current market is offering in terms of bpv. I will say for the 2.0L it was probably not worth the hassle of installation (did it mainly for fun, first turbo car). An intake will give you a very noticeable noise difference. It maybe changed the sound a bit but when running the stock intake it really isn’t noticeable with my setup. Maybe the 1.5L is different, not sure. Just changing the intake tube will make a difference, and it’s cheaper than a full intake.
 


LilToTo17

Senior Member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Jul 14, 2017
Threads
71
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
1,441
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Website
wheelwell.com
Vehicle(s)
98 Civic EX with SI Conversion-Sold, 2017 Civic Si Sedan
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
.
My reason is, over time, the rubber diaphragm in higher boost and with heat may cause it to leak or malfunction faster than a metal one. I've seen how they wear down faster and I typically recommend a metal one, I work with motors, pumps and piping and see rubber ones go out fairly quickly. I know it's not too serious for the cars, but I'd still like to change it out. I'm more upgrading little things that may go out sooner than other pieces. I do this with all my cars since I like to fiddle
There have been no fails on the stock bpv
 

AZCivicX

Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
15
Reaction score
9
Location
AZ
Vehicle(s)
2017 Civic Coupe EX-T
Country flag
@AZCivicX I assume you are looking for your Coupe. Not trying to be mean, but you did post in the type R forum. I’m not sure what the current market is offering in terms of bpv. I will say for the 2.0L it was probably not worth the hassle of installation (did it mainly for fun, first turbo car). An intake will give you a very noticeable noise difference. It maybe changed the sound a bit but when running the stock intake it really isn’t noticeable with my setup. Maybe the 1.5L is different, not sure. Just changing the intake tube will make a difference, and it’s cheaper than a full intake.
Whoops just noticed this was Type R forum lmao. I searched the forums for any aftermarket BPV and stumbled across this one. I do have a prl cobra cai and love the noise it makes but was just wondering if the BPV would do anything as far as noise. But thank you for the response it was the answer I was looking for!
 

kidk

Member
First Name
George
Joined
May 12, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
11
Reaction score
16
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
2019 Civic SI Coupe (FC3)
Country flag
So I stumbled upon this thread after going too far down a rabbit hole one dusk. I'm in the middle of a personal build, and decided to give the Boomba BPV a try, which I found out to be designed for the Type R (like a lot of cool parts for this gen), but fits the Civic SI. I'll start with the desired result:

I wanted to achieve that flutter sound that I've heard friends and others speak so highly of. After reading through this thread, as well as a couple others, along with some YouTube videos, and random blog posts/articles about the topic, I decided to just drop some money and find out for myself if this product would satisfy the requirement.

In short, it did not.

Here's a link to some video clips I took using a GoPro Hero 8:
Comparison Clips: OEM vs Boomba Bypass Valve

The swoosh did not flutter, but it was a little more crisp (if that's even imaginable). To my surprise, there were a few other things that I noticed, but before I dive into the expectations I want to drop some text on what Boomba advertises on their product page:

This high performance recirculating bypass valve is precision machined out of aircraft grade billet aluminum which is far superior to the cheap plastic factory piece. It features an internal brass piston design and is pressure tested to withstand up to 75psi, allowing it to compliment even the most aggressive turbo builds. Spring pre-load determines the pressure differential required across the piston before the BPV opens and releases the pressurized intake charge. Designed to be a replacement for the OEM bypass valve and is available in 4 different colors.

No aftermarket tuning required. Will work on stock tune or aftermarket tunes. This piece does not throw any check engine lights, does not cause any turbo lag, and does not make the vehicle stutter between shifts.

- 100% recirculating
- Higher flow
- Tried and true brass piston design
- Pressure tested to 75 PSI
- Easy install
- No need for re-tune
With all of that kept in mind, here are my observations upon less than a few hours of testing.
  1. The boost felt more consistent - instead of the boost simply kicking in at the start of the power band, the transition felt more controlled, as if gently, but quickly, opening an airlock
  2. Shifting felt more controlled as well, albeit a little stiffer - once you got into gear, it felt like the clutch caught on more evenly, and with a bit more demand. I do have the rev hang disabled through tune though, so this may affect some peoples' perspective
  3. The needle drop on the tachometer was more graceful
These observations sort of correlate with Boomba's description of benefits, yet these same observations could all be placebo, and my mind trying to justify spending almost $200 on something which provides what the OEM equivalent achieves at a satisfactory and reliable level (hard maybe my BPV will last longer?). I respect the build quality, but I generally don't recommend this part. The closest analogy I can make, spoken by someone who originates from PC builds, is it squeezes that last few tenths of a GHz you need to make it to 5GHz, but at the cost of a custom loop water cooling system.

I'll keep the part on and let everyone know how it goes with respect to longevity.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:


 


Top