I believe it was using Motec according to the posts on FB.It is multiple cars or multiple rods on the same engine that failed? Did this happen to a tuned car?
I'd venture to say this number is closer to 10.Only heard of 1.5 non-Si failures (1 perhaps 2) due to "playing" with a tune.
What Si failure?I'd venture to say this number is closer to 10.
I also saw an Si failure reported on Facebook.
This is the first I've heard of an R failure.
I know owners and dealers alike have a lot pride in their vehicles but, its always imperative that issues and failures are brought to light so that people can learn what not to do and maybe even find a solution for the issueSpeaking from personal and close friend experience... Often when there is a failure a tuner or owner will not want to talk about it. This is partially for sanity I am sure. But I think saving face and protecting a livelihood and pride also is a factor.
Be better informed - There are currently 3 versions of turbo Civics; the 1.5 liter available in the EX - Touring models, the 1.5 liter available in the Si model, and the 2.0 liter available in the CTR.how does half a car fail?/
But here's a big difference in seeing how far you can push a tuned engine program before putting it into production (for sale to the general public) and having a production version tune (unmodified) cause a failure.Speaking from personal and close friend experience... Often when there is a failure a tuner or owner will not want to talk about it. This is partially for sanity I am sure. But I think saving face and protecting a livelihood and pride also is a factor.
For sure the CTR is vastly different. The Si though.... slightly lower compression, slightly stronger rods (Base = 22 HRC vs Si = 28 HRC), different MAF, higher flowing intake/exhaust - I think that's about it for the engine. Seems likely the block is the same. From a value standpoint, the difference is worth it. But if someone was looking to modify anyway, they might justify getting a lower trim and going with better forged internals, a P&P job on the intake and exhaust manifolds, turbo upgrade, larger MAF, and a stronger LSD. That would hit all the same upgrades between them and likely result in a much improved performance gap. But it would cost more, and also be sans warranty as is. So there is a trade off. Risk vs reward. I've been modifying cars all my life, mostly using my wallet as the only tool. Had some great cars(02 WRX, 02 Z06) and some trainwrecks (11 EVOX, 02 Protege ES), thankfully many cars landed in the middle. Didn't gain brag worthy status, but didn't have any major issues either. Regardless - modifying cars was a time and money sink that now, at 40 years old and with my 3rd kid on the way.... I can't justify.Be better informed - There are currently 3 versions of turbo Civics; the 1.5 liter available in the EX - Touring models, the 1.5 liter available in the Si model, and the 2.0 liter available in the CTR.
I don't follow FB but the only "rod failures" I've heard of via CivicX was in a 1.5 liter EX - Touring models that had been "tuned" and "played with" by individuals/owners who were pushing the envelope (too far).
The Si and CTR version of the turbo engines are vastly different than the "base" 1.5 liter engine in the EX - Touring models.