Gruber
Senior Member
- First Name
- Mark
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 2,309
- Reaction score
- 1,521
- Location
- TN
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 Honda Civic Sport Touring; 2009 Honda CR-V EX-L
I'm tired if explaining and discussing what ON is.what do you even think octane is
It's a purely empirical definition which is explained again and again in hundreds of places. Yes, too many places, and some ignorants try to explain it too. But there is no problem with finding a good enough, correct enough explanation of the ON.
Chemically, it has all to do with the kinetics of reactions with oxygen (combustion) and because chemical kinetics is as a rule very complex, it is today still impossible to determine the ON of a substance teoretically (from the chemical structure). There are only some general, more or less theoretically based, empirical rules.
So theory not only is not very useful here, but also, anyone who doesn't understand the chemical kinetics of combustion will not understand what ON really means physically.
For these reasons, the ON for practical purposes, is only defined empirically. In the end, it is based on how a fuel behaves in an experiment involving running a standard laboratory engine, and compared to a standard fuel substance (isooctane). If a fuel burns in the standard engine like a mixture of 50/50 octane/isooctane its ON is 50. That's it. High octane fuel will burn in a nice progressing flame front, without tendency to explode ahead of the flame front at high pressue/temperature That's all there is to it by definition.
ON is correlated with the molecular structure of a compound but not directly correlated with molecular size, or volatility. Volatile or non volatile substances can have high or low octane numbers and there are plenty of examples.
Sponsored
Last edited: