But, what if you're not tracking the car. Do you still need all that breaking power and suspension for DD?With the 2.0 there is more room for modification, the 2.0 has been released for a little in the UK at least. Also, it has extra rigidity, nice sport seats, brembo brakes, hatchback body, it hasn't been in the US in ever besides the ITR (Acura), the extra 100 horses is a pretty big reason by itself. There are so many differences that it is too many to list, but just a few there.
Had a turbo'ed Si before and sold it for the specific reason to get this vehicle instead.
The STI isn't all it's cracked up to be honestly , I got it out of my system to own one. But the interior isn't great , road noise sucks , shifter is notchy, radio sucks bad. It's a fun car , but we don't get enough snow to justify the awd. But if I lived somewhere like Denver or where someone gets lots of snow I'd definitely keep it. It's fast & fun, but I'm a Honda enthusiast at heart , so once I seen the CTR was coming our way my mind was made up. And I'm not loosing much really. Same HP as the STI , actually a hair higher & WAY better amnaties on the CTR.That's very interesting for an STi owner (AWD) to give up STi for R. That is a lot to say about R. Because if the new 2020 STi (new platform) was out today, I'd buy it.
I agree and respect your Honda's enthusiasm.The STI isn't all it's cracked up to be honestly , I got it out of my system to own one. But the interior isn't great , road noise sucks , shifter is notchy, radio sucks bad. It's a fun car , but we don't get enough snow to justify the awd. But if I lived somewhere like Denver or where someone gets lots of snow I'd definitely keep it. It's fast & fun, but I'm a Honda enthusiast at heart , so once I seen the CTR was coming our way my mind was made up. And I'm not loosing much really. Same HP as the STI , actually a hair higher & WAY better amnaties on the CTR.
Your point well taken. When I was going to buy a Corvette a few years ago, I chose the Z06 for the exact reasons you brought up. This thread is for me to learn more about R from people who know more than me about R.What's the difference between Lancer AWD vs Evolution X? Or a base Mustang vs a GT350R?
The answer you're looking for is driving feel. To achieve this "feel" a lot of engineering and cost are involved. Stronger brakes, higher end bushings, track tuned suspension, Engineered powertrain, chassis balance, suspension geometry and etc. The purpose of the type R is fun to drive and fast.
Their are people whom doesn't care for performance cars hence they like their Prius.
Very well said.What's the difference between Lancer AWD vs Evolution X? Or a base Mustang vs a GT350R?
The answer you're looking for is driving feel. To achieve this "feel" a lot of engineering and cost are involved. Stronger brakes, higher end bushings, track tuned suspension, Engineered powertrain, chassis balance, suspension geometry and etc. The purpose of the type R is fun to drive and fast.
Their are people whom doesn't care for performance cars hence they like their Prius.
Do I absolutely need it? No.But, what if you're not tracking the car. Do you still need all that breaking power and suspension for DD?
I DO love the higher TQ though.
I suppose you could argue that virtually any amount of power is unnecessary if it's more than you need to get the car (eventually) to the maximum speed permitted in your country. Would you like to take a guess how many people contributing to a CTR forum are likely to feel that way?But, what if you're not tracking the car. Do you still need all that breaking power and suspension for DD?
Indeed, in the video that HPJ did at that workshop in Swindon I believe they said they can get to something like 370hp just with a remap without causing problems. If you're prepared to start replacing parts then of course the sky's the limit (in terms of power, cost, and tire wear!).With the 2.0 there is more room for modification