Si Factory Accessories / Performance Parts Released!

Tonezorz

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
105
Reaction score
113
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2017 Series.Yellow BRZ, 2014 Legacy, 2015 Crosstrek. Previous: 2011 Miata GT PRHT 2009 Forester XT, 2007 Cobalt

TheRealWizzy

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
204
Reaction score
128
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2017 Civic Si Coupe / 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix
Country flag
I'm very much looking forward to adding the Si with my preferred options to my list of definite buys. :)
Same, I've been looking for a different (more fun) car since I bought my first car at 16. After thousands of hours searching over that the internet for a different car, I finally decided I am getting a blue Si coupe whenever a local dealership gets one. Was hoping to have it before my 20th birthday but it doesn't look like that is going to happen.
 

ikbenben

Belgium spec
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Threads
12
Messages
435
Reaction score
271
Location
Belgium, Europe
Vehicle(s)
'17 Civic 1.5T Sport Plus HB
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
Then buy some OZ Ultraleggera's ??
 

Design

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Threads
28
Messages
3,329
Reaction score
2,903
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
09 MS3, 17 ABM Si Sedan
Country flag
i would have preferred lighter weight 17" instead of 19"
Honda almost never offers significantly lighter or heavier wheels due to their spring/damper configurations. Net weight including tires is usually within 15% of the factory package.
 


dmitri

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
1,151
Reaction score
1,497
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Civic Si sedan
Country flag
So do you guys know if losing as little as 2 or 3 lbs per wheel would actually make any sort of tangible difference in handling? (I.e. "tangible" to the point of it being worth investing $1000 or more into lighter wheels?)
 

Metfanant

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Threads
2
Messages
169
Reaction score
229
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
Vehicle(s)
1994 Mustang GT, 2003 Civic LX
Country flag
So do you guys know if losing as little as 2 or 3 lbs per wheel would actually make any sort of tangible difference in handling? (I.e. "tangible" to the point of it being worth investing $1000 or more into lighter wheels?)
for the VAST majority of Si owners, who will never do more than the occasional dash between stop lights? Nope...of course it will objectively make your car faster...but noticeable on the street? Nah...
 

Design

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Threads
28
Messages
3,329
Reaction score
2,903
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
09 MS3, 17 ABM Si Sedan
Country flag
So do you guys know if losing as little as 2 or 3 lbs per wheel would actually make any sort of tangible difference in handling? (I.e. "tangible" to the point of it being worth investing $1000 or more into lighter wheels?)
There are better areas to invest your money IMHO. Namely tires. You may see a small improvement in acceleration and braking. But those are usually overshadowed by a significant increase in road noise.
 

joe007

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
2
Messages
79
Reaction score
75
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Integra
Country flag
2 to 3 lbs per wheel (unsprung weight) will be a huge difference on the strip and on the track. You can get a decent set of lightweight wheels w/ tires (eg. RPF1) for cheaper than the HFP upgrade. Basically the HFP upgrade is stupid bling, like many of the Si features, unfortunately.
 

dmitri

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
1,151
Reaction score
1,497
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Civic Si sedan
Country flag
2 to 3 lbs per wheel (unsprung weight) will be a huge difference on the strip and on the track.
So let me rephrase my original question a little, to clarify what I was asking (and make sure @Metfanant and @Design considered this when answering [which they probably did, but just in case]): is there any qualitative difference between getting/making 4 wheels each 2 lbs lighter, vs just removing those same 8 lbs from elsewhere, say from the cabin? I.e. reducing wheel weight specifically, vs just reducing overall weight by the same amount?
Quick online research seems to suggest there is a difference, but I was wondering if it will actually be noticeable when driving on the street. (Given the same tires and everything else)

You can get a decent set of lightweight wheels w/ tires (eg. RPF1) for cheaper than the HFP upgrade. Basically the HFP upgrade is stupid bling, like many of the Si features, unfortunately.
Yeah i know... I was looking at tirerack.com - but it's still a lot of money... :cry: Although I've no idea what the HFP ones will cost (or weigh, for that matter)...
 
Last edited:


Metfanant

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Threads
2
Messages
169
Reaction score
229
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
Vehicle(s)
1994 Mustang GT, 2003 Civic LX
Country flag
So let me rephrase my original question a little, to clarify what I was asking (and make sure @Metfanant and @Design considered this when answering [which they probably did, but just in case]): is there any qualitative difference between getting/making 4 wheels each 2 lbs lighter, vs just removing those same 8 lbs from elsewhere, say from the cabin? I.e. reducing wheel weight specifically, vs just reducing overall weight by the same amount?
Quick online research seems to suggest there is a difference, but I was wondering if it will actually be noticeable when driving on the street. (Given the same tires and everything else)


Yeah i know... I was looking at tirerack.com - but it's still a lot of money... :cry: Although I've no idea what the HFP ones will cost (or weigh, for that matter)...
Yes, there is a difference, quite a big difference when you're dealing with unsprung vs spring weight...and even more so when you're dealing with rotational mass (wheels/tires)...

Removing 8lbs from your wheels/tires would be equivalent to removing a lot more weight from somewhere else on the car (like exhaust, seats, creature comforts, etc...)

If you have 2 cars with the same weight and power...the one with less unsprung weight will be faster...

That being said...I still don't think 8lbs is going to offer you a noticeable upgrade on the old butt dyno... we're talking fractions of a second in performance gains here
 

ikbenben

Belgium spec
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Threads
12
Messages
435
Reaction score
271
Location
Belgium, Europe
Vehicle(s)
'17 Civic 1.5T Sport Plus HB
Vehicle Showcase
1
Country flag
Losing unsprung weight gives more power at the wheels, less drivetrain loss.
1lbs unsprung weight has an equivalent of 4lbs spring weight. So losing 8lbs from your wheels gives the same result as losing 32lbs from elsewhere in your car.
 

JYR

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
917
Reaction score
1,308
Location
Cornfields
Vehicle(s)
8th gen Si
Country flag
I don't think there's going to be a lot of difference in straight line acceleration when comparing an Si to a non Si 1.5l Turbo civic w Hondata tune.

I recall reading the difference between the Si was just a factory tune. You may just as well be splitting hairs by comparing the two.

Be interesting to see how well the Si handles w it's suspension and lsd. On paper it looks good if not great, but who knows unless there's a test of the two.
Different turbo, and significantly different transmission. There will be differences.

Your assessment of a non-Si with Hondata tune is likely going to be apples to oranges. A tune is great, but not great without the supporting transmission. Honda offers fantastic grearboxes.
 

zroger73

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2017
Threads
56
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
4,544
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2019 MX-5 Miata GT-S, 2021 Ridgeline RTL-E
Country flag


 


Top