Have anyone Dyno the 10th gen si yet stock

[562Si]

I got my car dyno 158 hp and 160ft lbs I thought that SI has more power I was a little disappointed =/

Sponsored

 

[Stealthy86]

I got my car dyno 158 hp and 160ft lbs I thought that SI has more power I was a little disappointed =/

that's inaccurate, lol.

 

[562Si]

that's inaccurate, lol.

I wish it was true I'll post the dyno Sheet later

 

[who8myrice]

Truly heart breaking dyno.

 

[kritz]

206 stock with 220 torque

http://blog.vittuned.com/introducing-the-2017-civic-si/

 

[dmitri]

Also, from https://jst-performance.com/blogs/jst-results-blog/2017-honda-civic-si-dyno-results:

201 WHP and 209 Ft Lbs of Tq 100% bone stock on 93 octane

Also-also, from a data sheet on Hondata site, -- 204.5 hp/212 tq

I'm sure there are other similar results that can be easily found. There's something very wrong with those numbers in OP...

 

[17siturb0]

Do a 3 or 4th gear pull datalog and send it to Vit, have him send you the e dyno from the pull, much more accurate in my opinion, using real world driving vs a dyno shop trying to recreate a pull in real world driving conditions.

 

[ClemsonPatriot]

That's bull. There's no way a CAI adds 13 whp and 8 wtq! Also plenty of other reports are showing 200+ and 210+ whp and wtq, respectively.

I would demand my money back....

 

[das borgen]

demand money back on what? The dyno? the dealer?

That's bull. There's no way a CAI adds 13 whp and 8 wtq! Also plenty of other reports are showing 200+ and 210+ whp and wtq, respectively.

I would demand my money back....

 

[totopo]

Those honestly don't look like real data. They look like someone drew them out in excel.

 

[dmitri]

I would demand my money back....

Doesn't look like the dyno results can be trusted, meaning that the whole thing is somehow mis-calibrated. So it's not necessarily a "demand money back" situation... It seems like all the numbers are skewed.
E.g. by simple proportion (and I'm not at all saying that's the right way to do this, mathematically), we have:
If 158 <-> 205hp (actual stock hp),
then 171 <-> 222hp (possibly closer to what they achieved?)

[Again, whatever that "miscalibration formula" is, it's likely far from being a linear relationship like above, but just to throw it out there as a general thought...]

 

[CarNutAZ]

Heh, that's the bullsh** marketing flyer that comes with an AEM CAI. It's fake. They're trying to show their product gives you gains.

 

[ClemsonPatriot]

Doesn't look like the dyno results can be trusted, meaning that the whole thing is somehow mis-calibrated. So it's not necessarily a "demand money back" situation... It seems like all the numbers are skewed.
E.g. by simple proportion (and I'm not at all saying that's the right way to do this, mathematically), we have:
If 158 <-> 205hp (actual stock hp),
then 171 <-> 222hp (possibly closer to what they achieved?)

[Again, whatever that "miscalibration formula" is, it's likely far from being a linear relationship like above, but just to throw it out there as a general thought...]

I would 100% demand money back. If I paid good money for a product that is supposed to be accurate, I better get it.

 

[ClemsonPatriot]

demand money back on what? The dyno? the dealer?

The company that runs the dyno, they are the ones at fault here. A refund for a poor quality product is 100% reasonable.

 

[dmitri]

The company that runs the dyno, they are the ones at fault here. A refund for a poor quality product is 100% reasonable.

OK I thought you were talking about money back for CAI...

Sponsored