Actually the civic is manual and mustang auto. Very impressive on the civic's behalf considering the civic is a taller car as well.EDIT: Actually forget everything I said, there is clearly a point when the mustang hits 238 then slows dawn to 220, then back down again into the teens. This test is useless. The mustang also does more lane changes in the first test.
When you get up that high aerodynamics weight and gearing are playing much larger roles than just your typical red light run. The Civic is probably assisted by the extra "gearing ratios" in the CVT vs the 6spd auto in the Mustang. Also, the number of lane changes affect the times also. I didn't count them but any time changing lanes and not going perfectly straight will result in a longer time.
Also, the top end on the 2.3Ecoboost sucks hard without a tune, so if he was bothering to let all the gears wind out and (not sure if the Mustang auto has paddle shifters) then he may have also been wasting time.
Not saying this isn't repeatable, just not the best quality test.
Taller doesn't mean it's less aerodynamic. Ive been trying to find drag numbers for both cars but I can't. Just that the 2015 mustangs were reduced by 4% and the Civics was reduced by 12%. Remember the Mustangs front is rather blunt.Actually the civic is manual and mustang auto. Very impressive on the civic's behalf considering the civic is a taller car as well.
the hatch front end is blunt as wellTaller doesn't mean it's less aerodynamic. Ive been trying to find drag numbers for both cars but I can't. Just that the 2015 mustangs were reduced by 4% and the Civics was reduced by 12%. Remember the Mustangs front is rather blunt.
but he wasn't driving it backwards.the hatch front end is blunt as well
Motor Trend ran 10.5 with a stock P100D. There's a gutted one with slicks on YouTube $#^&@# racing making a killing.Just get a used tesla and gut it.....it is getting too easy.