1. Guest, see the CivicX Forum Rules and User Agreement before posting.  After reading click here to dismiss this notice →

Featured Car and Driver Instrumented Test Performance Results for Civic Type R

Discussion in 'Civic Type R Forum (FK8 - 10th Gen)' started by J35W2, Jul 6, 2017.




  1. J35W2

    J35W2 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2016
    Posts:
    329
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    511
    Location:
    NC
    Car(s):
    '00 supercharged Civic Si (sold), '06 Civic Si (sold) , '14 V6-6MT Accord Coupe (sold), '17 CTR #1637
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    Instrumented test. That'll do.

    Full article/review @ http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-honda-civic-type-r-test-review


    Figures compiled by jpmelfi:

    Civic Type R:
    Zero to 60 mph: 4.9 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 11.5 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 21.7 sec
    Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
    Top gear, 30-50 mph: 9.4 sec
    Top gear, 50-70 mph: 6.1 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 13.5 sec @ 108 mph
    Top speed (drag limited, C/Dest): 170 mph
    Braking, 70-0 mph: 142 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.02 g

    RS (on Cup 2s):
    Zero to 60 mph: 4.6 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 13.0 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 25.8 sec
    Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.9 sec
    Top gear, 30-50 mph: 9.7 sec
    Top gear, 50-70 mph: 6.6 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 13.4 sec @ 102 mph
    Top speed (governor limited, mfr's est): 165 mph
    Braking, 70-0 mph: 154 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.04 g

    Golf R (manual):
    Zero to 60 mph: 5.2 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 13.0 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 24.3 sec
    Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.3 sec
    Top gear, 30-50 mph: 10.5 sec
    Top gear, 50-70 mph: 7.5 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 13.7 sec @ 103 mph
    Top speed (governor limited, C/D est): 150 mph
    Braking, 70-0 mph: 157 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.95 g

    STI:
    Zero to 60 mph: 4.8 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 11.7 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 23.1 sec
    Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.4 sec
    Top gear, 30-50 mph: 11.0 sec
    Top gear, 50-70 mph: 7.7 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 13.3 sec @ 105 mph
    Top speed (drag limited): 159 mph
    Braking, 70-0 mph: 153 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.93 g
     
  2. Vdeity86 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2017
    Posts:
    228
    Thanked:
    123
    Occupation:
    IT Stuff
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    First Name:
    Victor
    Car(s):
    350z Anniversary Edition, Some old Accord..., soon to be CTR
    I didn't want this car for the 0-60, but anything beyond what I wanted it for is a plus!
     
    The_Fenix_2.0, Ruckus, GSquared and 4 others thanked this.
  3. mc1200s Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    120
    Thanked:
    57
    Location:
    Saint Louis Mo
    Car(s):
    16 ext
  4. mc1200s Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2016
    Posts:
    120
    Thanked:
    57
    Location:
    Saint Louis Mo
    Car(s):
    16 ext
    Sorry I posted this. I swear I looked. I overlooked the thread.

    Sorry again.
     
  5. jtrown

    jtrown Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Posts:
    257
    Thanked:
    204
    Location:
    Ms Gulf Coast
    Car(s):
    2004 Honda Civic Hybrid, 2010 Accord Crosstour, Rallye Red CTR
    Why would you apologize its good information on the car? I liked it, it was just their view and opinion. That's what this forum is about. It is a second post but that's ok. Thanks for posting.
     
  6. Boostlag Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Posts:
    845
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    729
    Occupation:
    Zenyatta Main
    Location:
    Fairfax, VA
    Car(s):
    TSX, MZ3
    Its about what I expected at 3100lbs and nearly 300whp. It will sure be faster in the straight line than a RS, STI and R stock for stock.. I'd be happy with about 112mph trap. I think a turboback and a tune should be more than enough. Question is what kind of turbo does this engine have and does it have anymore room to push the air needed.
     
  7. RB2490 Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2016
    Posts:
    8
    Thanked:
    3
    Location:
    new york
    Car(s):
    2015 wrx, 2015nissan juke nismo, 15 scion frs
    Those numbers are excellent. Way better than I thought it was going to be. Good job honda. Making me regret not getting this over a WRX but maybe in a few years.
     
  8. UFO CTR

    UFO CTR Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2016
    Posts:
    751
    Thanked:
    673
    Location:
    San Frrancisco, CA
    Car(s):
    2017 CTR#1348
    Wow! A stock Civic running in the 13's, FUCK!!! :spaz:
     
    RB2490 thanked this.
  9. leehom Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2017
    Posts:
    35
    Thanked:
    23
    Location:
    Texas
    Car(s):
    BMW
    I'd be disappointed if it couldn't run at least mid 13's.

    S2k were running mid to high 13's with a puny 240 hp.
     
  10. Zooropa82

    Zooropa82 Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2016
    Posts:
    1,591
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    1,524
    Location:
    PA
    Car(s):
    '16 Civic EX-T - '17 CRV EX Soon to be '18 Accord

    Let's not get crazy here.

    CTR will not smoke them, it will be close.

    RS will beat it off the line, rolling would be interesting. CTR will have the edge.
     
  11. Boostlag Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Posts:
    845
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    729
    Occupation:
    Zenyatta Main
    Location:
    Fairfax, VA
    Car(s):
    TSX, MZ3
    to get a s2k to 13's requires some 6-7k clutch drops, I would never want to do on my own car.
     
  12. boosted180sx Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    Posts:
    235
    Thanked:
    188
    Location:
    torrance, ca
    Car(s):
    2015 Civic SI SC, 03 S2000, 16 ILX
    yeah I agree lol. It's not going to "smoke" either one of them.

    I rather see real life numbers over magazine produced numbers anyways.
     
    Zooropa82 thanked this.
  13. Boostlag Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Posts:
    845
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    729
    Occupation:
    Zenyatta Main
    Location:
    Fairfax, VA
    Car(s):
    TSX, MZ3
    There are also intangible things that numbers and tests can't represent. Type R is a drivers car that requires real driving skills to extract the most out of. Majority people can jump in to a focus RS and drive it to its limit it because how much confidence it inspires from this awd and chassis. It really does make bad drivers look good. For most people that go to the track, Type R will be the better car as its more challenging to bring the best out of.
     
    boosted180sx thanked this.
  14. leehom Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2017
    Posts:
    35
    Thanked:
    23
    Location:
    Texas
    Car(s):
    BMW
    Why not? I had an ITR and did 6-7k clutch drops all the time. Never had an issue with my vehicle.
     
    Modomo thanked this.
  15. Boostlag Senior Member

    Rank:
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Posts:
    845
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Thanked:
    729
    Occupation:
    Zenyatta Main
    Location:
    Fairfax, VA
    Car(s):
    TSX, MZ3
    1. I don't live my life a quarter mile at a time.

    2. I have mechanical sympathy.
     
    Hatchy thanked this.
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
CarAndDriver Article on Honda Dealers "showing restraint" in regards to Type R markups Civic Type R Forum (FK8 - 10th Gen) Jul 7, 2017
Car and Driver road test Civic Type R Forum (FK8 - 10th Gen) Jul 6, 2017
2017 Civic Si Instrumented Test Results (0-60, 1/4 Mile) [Car and Driver] Civic Si Forum (10th Gen) Jun 28, 2017
Civic wins comparison test in Car and Driver Civic versus... Mar 1, 2017
Car & Driver Long Term Update : 2016 Civic Touring General 10th Gen Discussions Dec 29, 2016
Car and Driver ST review General 10th Gen Discussions Nov 15, 2016

Share This Page